Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Lodha Colliery Company Ltd. & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors

Supreme Court18 September 1986R. Misra · V. Khalid · G.L. Oza · M.M. Dutt

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The constitutional validity of the Coking Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 and the Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973, as amended by the Coal Mines Nationalisation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1978, must be upheld on the same parity of reasoning as applied in Tara Prasad Singh v. Union of India, which upheld the constitutional validity of a similar amending statute, the Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Amending Act, 1976.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

CASE NO.:Writ Petition (civil) 954 of 1977
PETITIONER:LODHA COLLIERY COMPANY LTD. & ORS.
RESPONDENT:UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 18/09/1986
BENCH:P.N. BHAGWATI CJ & R. MISRA & V. KHALID & G.L. OZA & M.M. DUTT
JUDGMENT:
JUDGMENT
1986 Suppl. SCC 496

With Writ Petition Nos. 2256 and 132 of 1977, 4432 and 4678 of 1978, 340, 1295-96, 1333-34, etc. of 1979, 428, 879, 668-69, etc. of 1980, 3441, 4712-14, 6250, etc. of 1981, 3474, 3206, 3464-65, etc. of 1982 and 54-56, 4225, 8234-35, etc. of 1983

1. These writ petitions and special leave petitions challenge the constitutional validity of the Coking Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 and the Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973 [as amended by the Coal Mines nationalisation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1978 ]. The question of constitutional validity of these two statutes as amended by the Amending Act of 1978 is covered by the ratio of the decision of this Court in Tara Prasad Singh v. Union of India where the constitutional validity of a similar amending statute viz. Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Amending Act, 1976 was upheld by this Court. The constitutional validity of these statutes as amended by the Amending Act of 1978 must therefore, be upheld on the same parity of reasoning as set out in the judgment in Tara Prasad Singh case. We would, therefore, dismiss all these writ petitions and special leave petitions but we may make it clear that if there are any other points raised in these writ petitions and special leave petitions we must not be deemed to have expressed any opinion, on the validity of those points and it will be open to the petitioners to raise them in appropriate proceedings in the High Court. The interim order made by the court in these writ petitions on August 2, 1983 will continue to operate for at period of four weeks in order to enable the petitioners to adopt appropriate proceedings in the High Court. There will be no order as to costs in these writ petitions and special leave petitions

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free