Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Labh Singh And Ors. vs State Of Punjab

Supreme Court31 January 1990S.R. Pandian

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

Where a trial court imposes a fine with a direction that compensation be paid to injured persons out of the fine amount if realised, and the appellate court modifies the fine and the compensation distribution but the total fine deposited exceeds the modified amount, the Supreme Court may reduce the fine to a reasonable level and direct refund of the excess amount to the appellants while ensuring that injured persons receive compensation from the retained portion in the proportions ordered by the appellate court.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

JUDGMENT
S. Ratnavel Pandian, J.

1. In this appeal, all the ten appellants who stood convicted under Sections 148, 450, 326, 307, 324 and 323 read with Section 149 I.P.C. and sentenced to various terms of imprisonment in addition to the imposition of fine amount with the usual default clause with a direction that all the substantive sentences should run concurrently and that a sum of Rs. 2,000/- be paid as compensation to the victim Jaspal Singh (PW-3) out of the fine amount, if realised, preferred an appeal before the High Court of Punjab & Haryana, which for the reasons assigned in its judgment set aside the conviction of all the appellants under Section 307 read with Section 149 of I.P.C. but confirmed the convictions of all the appellants in respect of the remaining offences. Coming to the question of sentence, the High Court reduced the sentences Of imprisonment to the period already undergone by the appellants under each count but enhanced the fine amount to Rs. 2,ooo/- in respect of each of the appellants for the conviction under Sections 326 and 326 read with Section 149 I.P.C. with the usual default clause and directed half of the fine amount, if realised, "shall be paid to Jaspal Singh (PW-3) and the remaining half to the other injured PWs, namely, Balwant Singh (PW-6) and Barbara Singh (PW-7) in equal proportion."

2. It is seen that at the time of granting leave to appeal, this Court was informed that the entire fine amount of Rs. 20,000/- imposed on all the appellants has already been deposited in this Court.

3. After hearing the learned counsel for both the parties and carefully going through the entire records, wo hold that there is no substance in this appeal and accordingly the appeal is dismissed. However, while confirming the judgment of the High Court, we reduce the fine amount of Rs. 2,000/- imposed on each of the appellants under Section 326 and 326 read with Section 149 of I.P.C. to Rs. 1,000/- in default to seller rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months. Out of the amount stated to have been deposited in this Court, half of the amount i.e. Rs. 10,000/- is directed to be refunded to the appellants and out of the balance fine amount of Rs. 10,000/- a sum of Rs. 5,000/- shall be paid to Jaspal Singh (PW-3) and the remaining half i.e. Rs. 5,000/- to the injured persons, namely, Balwant Singh (PW-6) and Darbara Singh (PW-7) in equal proportion.

4. Subject to the above modification, the criminal appeal is dismissed.

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free