Kiran vs Sharad Dutt
- SCC(2000) 10 SCC 243
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
A divorce petition initially filed on grounds of desertion, cruelty, and nullity may be amended to one under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for divorce by mutual consent) at the appellate stage when both parties have agreed to divorce by consent, and the court may grant such amendment and pass a decree for divorce by mutual consent accordingly. Where parties to matrimonial proceedings have been living separately for years, are unable to reconcile, have no children, and have jointly moved for divorce by mutual consent with agreed terms regarding alimony and maintenance, the court may, in exercise of its power under Article 142 of the Constitution, accept the consent terms and pass a decree for divorce by mutual consent under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, notwithstanding that the original petition was framed on different grounds.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
2. We have heard learned Counsel for the parties finally in this appeal.
3. During the pendency of the proceedings at SLP stage there was a development by which the parties agreed to get divorce by mutual consent. The matter was therefore, adjourned. We are happy to note that the consent terms came to be filed on these lines duly signed by the appellant-wife as well as respondent-husband and also by their Advocates-on-record. We have gone through I.A. No.3 of 1999 which has been jointly moved by both the parties for getting a decree of divorce by mutual consent. In our view, the terms suggested are quite fair. We find that both the parties are living separately since years and they are not in position to see eye to eye and live together. They are not blessed with any child. Therefore, the prayer in original Hindu Marriage Petition No.584 of 1988 which was for divorce on the ground of alleged desertion and cruelty by wife and also under Section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act wherein the respondent-husband sought a decree for nullity on the ground that there was no custom of marriage between the first cousins would no longer survive. The prayer in I.A. No.3 of 1999 for permitting the parties to amend the Hindu Marriage Petition is allowed in terms of para 3 of the I.A. We grant amendment to the divorce petition by treating it to be one under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The proceedings between the husband and wife for dissolution of marriage are pending since 11 years. On the fact of the case, there is no necessity to further delay the passing of the decree for divorce by mutual consent. We therefore, in exercise of our power under Article 142 of the Constitution of India accept the consent terms filed by the parties and direct that a decree for divorce by mutual consent under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 be passed in this case. The agreement regarding payment of permanent alimony and monthly maintenance as laid down in paragraph 2(a) to (d) shall form part of the decree for dissolution of marriage by mutual consent. The judgments and decrees of the High Court and trial court are set aside. The Hindu Marriage Petition will stand allowed in terms of prayer for divorce by mutual consent. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free