Khadi & Village Industries Commission vs State of T.N.
- SCC(1998) 8 SCC 546
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The exemption from State sales tax and Central sales tax under the notifications issued under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 applies only to sales of specified village industry products effected by institutions and persons certified by the Khadi & Village Industries Commission or Board, and does not extend to sales effected by the Commission itself, which is not a certified institution or person.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
2. The only question in this case is whether the sales, whether by way of inter-State sales or intra-State sales effected by the Khadi & Village Industries Commission, Tamil Nadu are exempted from the State sales tax/Central sales tax by virtue of the notifications in GOPs No. 272 dated 11-2-1967 issued under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 and Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The statutory notifications contained in the said government order read as follows:
"NOTIFICATION I
In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 17 of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959 (Madras Act 1 of 1959), the Governor of Madras hereby makes the exemption in respect of the tax payable under the said Act on the sale of all products of village industries specified in the Schedule to the Khadi & Village Industries Commission Act, 1956 (Central Act 61 of 1956) effected by the institutions and persons certified for the purpose by the Khadi & Village Industries Commission or Madras State Khadi & Village Industries Board, subject to the condition that they shall deal only in products of village industries specified in the Schedule to the said Central Act 61 of 1956.
NOTIFICATION II
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (5) of Section 8 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (Central Act 74 of 1956) the Governor of Madras hereby directs that no tax under the said Act shall be payable in respect of the sales of all products of village industries specified in the Schedule to the Khadi & Village Industries Commission Act, 1956 (Central Act 61 of 1956) effected by the institutions and persons certified for the purpose, by the Khadi & Village Industries Board, subject to the condition that they shall deal only in products of village industries specified in the Schedule to the said Central Act 61 of 1956."
The relevant facts herein are that institutions and persons certified by the Commission manufactured goods specified in the Schedule to the Khadi & Village Industries Commission Act, 1956 and sold those goods to the Commission. The Commission in turn sold those goods to others. The question in this appeal is whether the sales effected by the Commission to others are exempted under the aforesaid notifications. In view of the clear and unambiguous language of the notifications, we are of the opinion that under these notifications the Commission cannot claim any exemption. The exemption applies to sales of specified goods effected by the certified institutions and persons. The Commission is not a certified person or institution. We are therefore of the opinion that the said notifications do not avail the Commission.
3. We do not express any opinion whether there is any other notification or any other provision of law under which the Commission can claim exemption in respect of the said sales. This observation we are making because in GOPs No. 272 dated 11-2-1967, there is a reference to GO No. 3131 Revenue dated 25-10-1963 which appears to exempt the sales effected by the Khadi & Village Industries Board. The record before us however, does not show whether the GO was in force during the relevant time concerned herein. Our decision is confined to the interpretation and effect of the statutory notifications contained in GOPs No. 272 aforesaid.
4. The appeal is allowed to the extent indicated above.
5. No costs.
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free