Karpoori Thakur vs Baikunth Nath Dey And Anr.
- SCC1990 Supp (1) SCC 136
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Even where alleged offences are non-compoundable under the Criminal Procedure Code, a court exercising jurisdiction under Section 482 of the CrPC may, in its discretion, quash prosecution proceedings where continuation of the prosecution would not serve any useful purpose and would not be in the public interest, notwithstanding that the parties have settled their dispute. A High Court exercising powers under Section 482 of the CrPC cannot rely upon a settlement between parties to quash prosecution for offences that are non-compoundable under Section 320 of the CrPC without considering whether the continuation of prosecution would serve the public interest or any useful purpose.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
2. In the facts and circumstances of the case, we have considerable doubt whether the High Court could have under Section 482 of the CrPC, 1973 adverted to paragraph 63 of the Case Diary or relied upon the letter addressed by the parties to the Officer Incharge, Ramgarh Police Station dated January 13, 1985, and quashed the prosecution against respondent No. 1 Baikunth Nath Dey on the ground that the parties had settled their disputes. It failed to appreciate that the alleged offences punishable under Sections 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 were not compoundable even with the permission of the Court, under Section 320 of the CrPC. That apart, the subsequent letter addressed by the appellant Karpoori Thakur to the Officer Incharge, Police Station Ramgarh dated July 25, 1985 shows that respondent No. 1 did not deposit the money in accordance with the settlement. It is unfortunate that the High Court should have passed an order in a perfunctory manner.
3. Even so, we do not think that it would serve any useful purpose to direct the prosecution to continue. Nor would such a prosecution be in the public interest. The dispute relates to the withdrawal of Rs. 39,800/- by respondent No. 1 through cheque No. 017818 from the account which stood with the Central Bank of India, Hazari Bagh in the name of 'Sri Karpoori Thakur for Chowdhari Charan Singh Fund (Lok Dal)'. The amount had been entrusted by the late Chowdhari Charan Singh, the National President of the Lok Dal to the appellant for party work.
4. We do not think that it would also be expedient to allow the prosecution to continue, in view of the statement made by respondent No. 1 Baikunth Nath Dey, Advocate, who is present in Court. He states before us that he is agreeable to the Central Bank of India, Hazari Bagh transferring the remaining amount of Rs. 38,000/- to the earlier account in the name of 'Sri Karpoori Thakur for Chowdhari Charan Singh Fund (Lok Dal)' and undertakes to credit a sum of Rs. 1,800/- in that account to make good the deficit. The said amount of Rs. 39,800/- shall not be disbursed by the Bank except under the orders of the Court of competent jurisdiction i.e. the account shall hereafter be operated by the rightful party, whoever it is.
5. The appeal is disposed of accordingly.
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free