J.P Ravidas & Ors. vs Navyavak Harijan Uthapan Hulti Unit Industrial Co-op. Societ
- SCC(1997) 6 SCC 378
- Neutral1997 INSC 519
- SCR[1997] Supp (1) SCR 445
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where a cooperative society has allotted residential flats in violation of reservation regulations that mandated allotment to members of a specified category (Dalit members), the allotments made in contravention of those regulations are liable to be cancelled and the flats must be reallocated to eligible members of the reserved category, notwithstanding that the non-compliant allottees are in possession. Where allotments have been made to employees of a municipal corporation and those allotments fall within the general (unreserved) category under the applicable regulations, such allotments are entitled to be regularised and need not be cancelled even if made by a builder in technical contravention of original Government directions concerning the land, provided the reservation requirements for other categories are separately satisfied. The registrar of a cooperative society has authority to enquire into and determine whether allotments made by a builder comply with the eligibility requirements and reservation regulations applicable to the property, and to direct the ejection of persons allotted flats in violation of those regulations and the reallotment to eligible members of the reserved category.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
RESPONDENT: NAVYAVAK HARIJAN UTHAPAN HULTI UNIT INDUSTRIAL CO-OP. SOCIET
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/07/1997
BENCH: K. RAMASWAMY, D.P. WADHWA
ACT:
HEADNOTE:
JUDGMENT:
O R D E R Pursuant to the direction issued by this Court on April 12, 1996 in J.P Ravidas & Ors. vs Navyavak Haruan Uthapan Multi Unit Industrial Cooperative Societies Ltd. & Ors. [(1996) 9 SCC 800], the registrar of the cooperative society made an enquiry into the eligibility of the person to whom the allotments have been made by the builder in contravention of the original directions issued by the Government while allotting the Government land. It is clearly established from the report that the builder has grossly violated the regulation of allotment of the flats to the non-Delit members. This ultimate finding recorded by the Registrar is that 40 non-dalit members are in the possession of the flats contrary to the regulation and accordingly he directed the Administrator to eject those person and allot these flats to the Dalit members in accordance therewith. We find that the report is correct. According to Shri Harish Salve, learned counsel for the employees of the Municipal Corporation they are entitled to allotment of the flats in the building constructed by the society. The Registrar is not right in cancelling these allotments. Shri R.S. Masodkar, learned counsel for the State, in fairness, has stated that the view taken by the Registrar is not correct to the reservation as per the Regulation. It should be determined by the Registrar and to that extent the allotment made to the Corporation's employees is directed to be regularised. This is out of general category. The 40 non-dalits allotees will go. As regards the Dalit members, the direction given is perfectly valid and warrants no interference.
An application for clarification has been filed by the Society stating that the management has not handed over the possession of the flats to the appellants: instead the administrator has been appointed.
In view of these facts and circumstances, we direct that the administrator should take necessary steps to have all these 40 persons named in the report of the registrar ejected. 40 Dalit eligible members should be admitted and flats allotted to them . Thereafter, he is directed to hand over the management to the Navyuvak Harijan Uchapan Multi Unit Industrial Coop. Society. The application is accordingly disposed of.
The Registrar of the Cooperative Society is directed to oversee the actions taken by the Administrator in ejecting the person in possession in alloting 40 flats to the Dalits members; in collecting the amount from them handling over the amount to the non-dalits who are dispossessed from the building.
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free