India Cements Ltd vs State Of Tamil Nadu & Ors
- CitationAIRONLINE 2009 SC 138
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
An appellate court cannot dispose of an appeal on the merits when the appeal was not listed in the daily cause list, was taken up from the weekly list without notice to the parties or their counsel, and none of the parties could represent themselves. The disposal of such an appeal constitutes a procedural violation that renders the order unjustified and warrants remand for reconsideration with proper notice and opportunity of hearing to all parties.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
CIVIL APPEAL NO.2133 OF 2009 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.15300 of 2008)
India Cements Ltd. ...Appellant(s)
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. ...Respondent(s)
O R D E R
Leave granted.
By an order dated 6.9.2006, the learned Single Judge of the Madras High Court allowed the writ petition filed by the appellant and quashed the demand of water charges created by Collector, Tirunelveli in lieu of the use of water from Tamirabarani river. The writ appeal filed by the respondents against the order of the learned Single Judge was taken up for hearing on 18.3.2008 from the weekly list of the court and even though none appeared for either of the parties, the Division Bench allowed the same on the ground of availability of alternative remedy and also on the ground that in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, the Court cannot go into the question of interpretation of an agreement.
It is not in dispute that the writ appeal filed by the respondent was not shown in the daily cause list and it was taken up from out of the weekly list without notice to the parties or their counsel and as a result none could represent the parties. This being the position, the Division Bench was not justified in disposing of the appeal on merits.
...2/-
-2- Accordingly, the appeal is allowed, impugned order passed in the writ appeal is set aside and the matter is remanded to that Court for deciding the writ appeal on merits in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, the High Court is requested to dispose of the writ appeal as expeditiously as possible.
......................J. [B.N. AGRAWAL]
......................J. [G.S. SINGHVI] New Delhi, April 02, 2009.
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free