Govt. (NCT of Delhi) vs Kishan Chand
- Neutral2016 INSC 883
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where a land acquisition proceeding has been found defective and the appeals of the requisitioning authority have been dismissed on the merits, the acquiring authority may be granted a limited period within which to initiate fresh acquisition proceedings under Section 11 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, exercising the liberty granted under Section 24(2) of that Act; if such fresh proceedings are not initiated within the prescribed period, the acquiring authority must restore physical possession of the land to the original owner.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9217 OF 2016 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 27345 OF 2016 ] [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) ......CC NO. 17281 OF 2016]
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI THE SECRETARY, LAND AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND ANR. APPELLANT (s)
VERSUS
KISHAN CHAND AND ORS. RESPONDENT(s)
WITH
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9218 OF 2016 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 27346 OF 2016 ] [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)......CC NO. 17349 OF 2016]
J U D G M E N T
KURIAN, J.
1. Delay condoned.
2. Leave granted.
3. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgments in Civil Appeal No. 8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition(C) No. 8467 of 2015 and Civil Appeal No. 5811 of 2015 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 21545 of 2015. The appeals filed by the requisitioning authority, namely the Delhi Development Authority, have already been dismissed by this Court.
4. These appeals are, accordingly, dismissed.
5. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of these cases, the appellant is given a period of one year to exercise its liberty granted under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for initiation of the acquisition proceedings afresh.
6. We make it clear that in case no fresh acquisition proceedings are initiated within the said period of one year from today by issuing a Notification under Section 11 of the Act, the appellant, if in possession, shall return the physical possession of the land to the original land owner.
Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
No costs.
.......................J. [ KURIAN JOSEPH ]
.......................J. [ ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN ]
New Delhi;
September 16, 2016.
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free