Good Year India Ltd. vs Collector Of Customs
- SCC(2000) 10 SCC 489
- AIRAIR 1999 SC 1558
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where valves fall within Sub-Heading (2) of Heading 84.61 (84.81) of the Customs Tariff by virtue of being made of corrosion-resisting material, the list of specific metals in that Sub-Heading (stainless steel, nickel monel, incoloy, hostelry) is illustrative and not exhaustive; accordingly, valves made of copper alloy or other corrosion-resisting materials not expressly named fall within Sub-Heading (2) if they are established to be corrosion-resisting, rather than defaulting to Sub-Heading (1) "Not elsewhere specified".
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
1. The only question that falls for consideration in these appeals is whether inner tube valves imported by the appellants in connection with the manufacture of tubes or tyres are classifiable under Sub-Heading (1) of Heading 84.61 (84.81) of the Customs Tariff as claimed by the Revenue or under Sub-Heading (2) of Heading 84.61 (84.81) as claimed by the appellants. Heading 84.61 (84.81) of the Customs Tariff reads as under:
taps, cocks valves and similar appliances for pipes, boiler, shells, tanks, vats or the like, including pressure reducing valves and thermo-statically controlled valves.
(1) Not elsewhere specified.
(2) Isolating valves, non-return valves, safety valves, pressure reducing valves, exhaust relief valves, thermostatically controlled valves, solenoid operated valves; valves made of corrosion-resisting material such as stainless steel, nickel monel, incoloy, hostelry and other valves lines with rubber or other corrosion-resisting materials; steam traps.
2. The valves are made of copper alloy and the appellants have produced certificates of the manufacturers in support of their claim that the valves were made of corrosion-resisting material. In these circumstances, the authorities should have procured on the basis that the valves were made of corrosion resisting material and merely be- cause they are made of copper alloy would not disentitle the appellants from claiming that they fall under Sub-Heading (2). The words "such as stainless steel, nickel monel, incoloy, hostelry" in Sub-Heading (2) are only illustrative of the various metals from which valves can be made but the said description is not exhaustive of the; metals. If the material from which the valves are made is a corrosion resisting material then the; valves would fall under Sub-Heading (2) of Heading 84.61 (84.81). In these circumstances, we are unable to uphold the impugned judgments and it must be held that the valves imported by the appellants being made of corrosion resisting material, would fall under Sub-Heading (2) of Heading 84.61 (84.81) of the Customs Tariff. The appeals are accordingly allowed and the impugned judgments are set aside. No order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free