Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Gkn Driveshafts (India) Ltd vs Income Tax Officer And Ors

Supreme Court25 November 2002Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri · Arijit Pasayat

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

When a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is issued, the proper procedure requires the noticee to file a return and, if desired, seek reasons for issuance of the notice; the assessing officer is bound to furnish such reasons within a reasonable time; upon receipt of reasons, the noticee is entitled to file objections to the issuance of the notice; and the assessing officer is bound to dispose of such objections by passing a speaking order before proceeding with the assessment.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 7731 of 2002
PETITIONER:GKN DRIVESHAFTS (INDIA) LTD.
RESPONDENT:INCOME TAX OFFICER AND ORS.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 25/11/2002
BENCH:SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI & ARIJIT PASAYAT
JUDGMENT:
JUDGMENT
2002 Supp(4) SCR 359
The following Order of the Court was delivered :
Heard learned counsel for the parties. Leave is granted.

By the order under challenge, a Division Bench of the High Court at Delhi dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant challenging the validity of notices issued under Sections 148 and 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The High Court took the view that the appellant could have taken all the objections in its reply to the notices and that, at that stage, the writ petition was premature. Accordingly, the writ petition was dismissed on 31st January, 2001. Aggrieved by that order, the appellant is in appeal before us.

Mr. M.L. Verma, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant, submits that the impunged notices relate to seven assessment years; that during the pendency of these appeals, in respect of two assessment years, viz., 1995-96 and 1996-97, assessment has been completed against which appeals have been filed. Notices relating to the other five assessment years, viz., 1992-93, 1993-94, 1994-95, 1997-98 and 1998-99, are now the subject-matter of these appeals.

We see no justifiable reason to interfere with the order under challenge. However, we clarify that when a notice under Section 148 of the Income tax Act is issued, the proper course of action for the noticee is to file return and if he so desires, to seek reasons for issuing notices. The assessing officer is bound to furnish reasons within a reasonable time. On receipt of reasons, the noticee is entitled to file objections to issuance of notice and the assessing officer is bound to dispose of the same by passing a speaking order. In the instant case, as the reasons have been disclosed in these proceedings, the assessing officer has to dispose of the objections, if filed, by passing a speaking Order before proceeding with the assessment in respect of the abovesaid five assessment years.

Insofar as the appeals filed against the order of assessment before the Commissioner (Appeals), we direct the appellate authority to dispose of the same, expeditiously.

With the above observations, the civil appeals are dismissed. No costs.

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free