Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Food Corporation Of India, Karnal vs State Of Haryana And Ors.

Supreme Court10 January 2000D.P. Wadhwa · S. Saghir Ahmad

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The requirement under Section 39(5) of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act 1973 that an appeal shall not be entertained unless the full amount of tax assessed, penalty and interest have been paid is not absolute and mandatory; the appellate authority possesses discretion under the proviso to entertain an appeal without full payment where the person establishes inability to pay, provided that the amount of tax and interest admitted as due has been paid, and the balance amount is secured by bank guarantee or adequate security to the satisfaction of the appellate authority, to be recorded in writing.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

ORDER
S. Saghir Ahmad, J.
1. Leave granted.

2. We have heard learned Counsel for the parties. We have also gone through various orders passed by this Court at the interim stage in other cases.

3. Section 39(5) together with its first proviso of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act 1973 provides as under :

39(5) No appeal shall be entertained unless it is filed within sixty days from the date of the order appealed against and the appellate authority is satisfied, that the amount of tax assessed and the penalty and interest, if any, recoverable from the person has been paid;

Provided that the said authority, if satisfied that the person is unable to pay the whole of the amount of tax assessed, or the penalty imposed, or the interest due, he may, if the amount of tax and interest admitted by the appellant to be due has been paid, for reasons to be recorded in writing, entertain the appeal and may stay the recovery of the balance amount subject to the furnishing of a bank guarantee or adequate security in the prescribed manner to the satisfaction of the appellate authority;

4. The requirement under Sub-section (5) that the appeal will not be entertained unless the amount of tax assessed and the penalty and interest, if any, recoverable from the person concerned have been paid is not mandatory as under the proviso quoted above, a discretion is vested in the authority that if the person is unable to pay the whole of the amount of tax assessed, the appeal may be entertained and heard on merits without requiring that person to deposit the entire amount of tax and may stay the recovery thereof subject to furnishing of a bank guarantee or an adequate security to the satisfaction of the appellate authority.

5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case and the question involved in the appeals pending before the authority, we dispose of these appeals by directing that instead of depositing the entire amount of tax assessed on the appellant, he may furnish adequate security to the satisfaction of the appellate authority within such time as may be fixed by the authority. If this is done, the appeals shall be heard on merits.

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free