Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Directions to HDFC AMC and others

Securities And Exchange Board Of India17 June 2010

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

This is an ad interim ex parte direction order, and the reasoning it contains is the prima facie view of the Whole Time Member that the conduct of the persons named is in breach of the SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Relating to Securities Market) Regulations, 2003, and that the AMC is answerable for its employee's acts of omission under Regulation 25(3) of the Mutual Funds Regulations, 1996, and must observe the integrity standard in Clause 8 of the Fifth Schedule. The following are the grounds on which the directions rest. A dealer of a mutual fund asset management company who, in breach of his duty to execute the company's orders promptly, tips a third party to trade ahead of those orders and then postpones execution of the company's trades so as to let the tipped trades take the liquidity, misuses the discretion vested in him as dealer and commits a prima facie fraudulent and unfair trade practice within the meaning of Regulations 3 and 4 of the 2003 Regulations. Persons who knowingly trade on the basis of such tips, and persons through whose trading accounts such trades are executed, are prima facie participants in the same front-running and are liable under the same Regulations, the operator of an account being treated as participating in the trades placed through it. An asset management company is, under Regulation 25(3) of the Mutual Funds Regulations, 1996, responsible for acts of commission or omission of its employees, and is therefore prima facie answerable for front-running committed by its equities dealer in the course of his employment, while also being bound by the integrity and fairness standard of Clause 8 of the Fifth Schedule. Where prima facie front-running by an intermediary's employee threatens unitholders and the securities market, and the conduct is not to be viewed indulgently, the Board may, under Sections 11(1), 11(4) and 11B read with Section 19 of the SEBI Act, 1992 and Regulation 11 of the 2003 Regulations, issue interim ex parte directions restraining the employee's engagement by the AMC in trading, requiring deposit of estimated losses and illegitimate gains into segregated or escrow accounts pending further orders, prohibiting the named persons from dealing in securities, and requiring an internal inquiry and remedial overhaul of internal controls, the estimated losses being quantified by comparing the actual trades with the trades that would have been executed had there been no front-running.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

WTM/KMA/IVD/267/06/2010SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIAORDER

DIRECTIONS UNDER SECTIONS 11(1), 11(4) AND 11B OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992 AGAINST MR. NILESH KAPADIA, MR. RAJIV RAMNIKLAL SANGHVI, RAJIV RAMNIKLAL SANGHVI (HUF), MR. CHANDRAKANT P. MEHTA AND MS. DIPTI PARAS MEHTA 1. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as SEBI) had received two separate references from the Bombay Stock Exchange Limited (hereinafter referred to as BSE) and the National Stock Exchange of India Limited (hereinafter referred to as NSE) on suspected instances of front-running of the orders of HDFC Mutual Fund. The said stock exchanges had found certain coincidence between the trading pattern of individuals namely, Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi (trading mostly on NSE), Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta and Ms. Dipti Paras Mehta (both trading on BSE) with that of HDFC Asset Management Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as HDFC AMC). However, no apparent connections were noted by the stock exchanges. The preliminary findings of SEBI in respect of the said references are given in the following paragraphs.

2. HDFC AMC manages the assets of the HDFC Mutual Fund and also provides portfolio management services to other clients. The fund managers and portfolio managers of HDFC AMC get their deals executed through a common dealing desk within the AMC which mostly receives these orders through computerized systems and then allocates them to various stock brokers. The dealer has the discretion to execute the orders at any time during the day, depending on the traded volumes/prices. Mr. Nilesh Kapadia, Assistant Vice President–Equities of HDFC AMC has been its equities dealer since June 2000. SEBI found that Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi had dealt through the sub broker, M/s Om Enterprises (affiliated with ISE Securities Limited for trading on NSE and affiliated with M/s Jitendra Harjivandas Securities, for trading on BSE). It was also found that Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta had opened his trading account with M/s Om Enterprises, for trading on BSE along with his daughter-in-law, Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta, on April 20, 2007. It was also found that prior to this, Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta had been an investor in securities, buying and holding shares for a long period. Though, Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta had opened a trading account, the same was being operated by Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta. It was found that Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi and Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta (for himself and Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta) were trading from the premises of M/s. Om Enterprises. While Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi mostly traded on NSE, the trades of Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta and Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta were on BSE.

3. SEBI took up the aforesaid references for investigation and after substantial groundwork; the case related to suspicious trading by Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi (referred by NSE) was converted into a formal investigation with the appointment of the Investigating Authority. While carrying out the investigations, it was found that the other case related to the suspected frontrunning by Mr. Chadrakant P. Mehta and Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta (referred by BSE) was linked to the case involving Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi. Thereafter, the investigations into the two cases were combined.

4. The investigation conducted so far in the matter had revealed 38 instances over 24 scrip days spread across BSE and NSE during April to July 2007. In these instances, Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi/Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta/Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta were placing buy/sell orders ahead of substantial buy/sell orders of HDFC AMC. The buy/sell by the abovementioned persons were successively followed by the buy/sell by HDFC AMC till finally, the aforesaid persons could square off their trades within the same trading session, substantially against the orders of HDFC AMC that were still coming in. In the investigated instances, the volumes accumulated by the said individuals were also found to be significantly large. Thus, the instances apparently represented front running. In the 38 instances mentioned in the following tables, Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi, Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta and Mrs. Dipti P. Mehta have made substantial intra day profits by front running the orders of HDFC AMC.

Profits made by Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi (Amounts in Rs.lakh) Buy Qty Sell Qty Net Qty Realized Sl. in Lac in Lac in Lac Buy profit in No Trade Date Scrip shares shares shares value Sell value Rs. Lac 1 13-Apr-07 ICRA 0.46 0.46 0 282.04 291.98 9.94 2 19-Apr-07 ZEEL 2.18 2.172 0.008 573.57 586.97 15.5 3 24-Apr-07 CENTURYTEX 1.25 1.25 0 746.2 758.35 12.15 4 3-May-07 DISHTV 2.05 2.05 0 226.12 235.21 9.09 5 8-May-07 BHARTIARTL 0.92 0.92 0 755.56 759.63 4.07 6 9-May-07 HTMEDIA 3.12 3.12 0 624.19 634.31 10.12 7 10-May-07 TATAELXSI 0.38 0.38 0 120.08 123.46 3.38 8 10-May-07 UNIPHOS 0.96 0.96 0 283.65 285.84 2.19 9 15-Jun-07 UNIPHOS 0.65 0.65 0 192.41 195.25 2.84 10 26-Jun-07 RPL 3.28 3.28 0 343.46 351.1 7.64 11 16-Jul-07 SBIN 0.25 0.25 0 388.56 389.58 1.03 12 17-Jul-07 ZEENEWS 2.56 2.56 0 126.83 133.3 6.47 13 17-Jul-07 DISHTV 0.68 0.68 0 65.14 66.58 1.44 14 18-Jul-07 ZEENEWS 7.16 7.16 0 402.45 421.02 18.57 15 24-Jul-07 SPARC 0.61 0.61 0 58.87 60.95 2.08 Total 106.51 Profits made by Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta (Amounts in Rs.lakh) Buy Qty Sell Qty Net Qty Realized Sl. in Lac in Lac in Lac Buy profit in No Trade Date Scrip shares shares shares value Sell value Rs. Lac 1 13-Apr-07 ICRA 0.36 0.36 0 229.32 235.6 6.28 2 11-May-07 RIL 0.19 0.19 0 301.22 303.14 1.92 3 12-Jun-07 Dishman 0.372 0.372 0 112.15 114.19 2.04 United 4 12-Jun-07 Phos 0.267 0.267 0 72.058 72.65 0.592 Amtek 5 12-Jun-07 Auto 0.29 0.29 0 122.66 124.45 1.79 7 16-Jul-07 Dish TV 1.03 1.03 0 101.09 103.32 2.23 8 17-Jul-07 RIL 0.17 0.17 0 309.28 311.35 2.07 9 17-Jul-07 Birla 3M 0.024 0.024 0 47.02 49.66 2.64 10 17-Jul-07 ZEENEWS 1.45 1.45 0 71.89 75.4 3.51 11 18-Jul-07 ZEENEWS 5.29 5.29 0 296.26 310.68 14.42 12 19-Jul-07 ZeeNEWS 0.524 0.524 0 34.495 37.124 2.629 13 23-Jul-07 ZEENEWS 0.19 0.19 0 12.75 13.08 0.33 14 31-Jul-07 TV Today 0.78 0.78 0 113.28 119.59 6.31 Total 46.761 Profits made by Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta (Amounts in Rs.lakh) Buy Qty Sell Qty Net Qty Realized Sl. in Lac in Lac in Lac Buy profit in No Trade Date Scrip shares shares shares value Sell value Rs. Lac 1 13-Apr-07 ICRA 0.51 0.51 0 319.08 327.78 8.7 2 19-Apr-07 ZEEL 0.85 0.85 0 223.6 229.64 6.04 3 24-Apr-07 CENTURYTEX 0.9 0.9 0 536.35 546.04 9.69 4 3-May-07 DISHTV 1.15 1.15 0 126.39 131.79 5.4 5 3-May-07 ICICIBANK 0.7 0.7 0 608.98 613.43 4.45 6 8-May-07 BHARTIARTL 0.35 0.35 0 287.37 288.74 1.37 7 9-May-07 HTMEDIA 1.28 1.28 0 258.2 261.54 3.34 8 10-May-07 TATAELXSI 0.23 0.23 0 72.68 74.506 1.826 9 26-Jun-07 RPL 2 1.71 0.29 209.43 183.62 4.56 Total 45.38

5. The preliminary findings of investigation also revealed that Mr. Nilesh Kapadia, Assistant Vice President–Equities of HDFC AMC was tipping off and advising Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi to trade ahead of the orders of HDFC AMC and had helped him to make substantial gains in the process. Though, Mr. Nilesh Kapadia and Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi had initially claimed in their statement to SEBI during the investigation that they did not know each other, the investigations unearthed evidence of their regular conversations over telephone during the relevant period (April to July, 2007) when the instances of front-running identified by BSE and NSE, had taken place. It was also found that Mr. Nilesh Kapadia and Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi were college mates and had known each other since long. Evidence collected in the form of telephonic call records and the transcript of conversations between them reflect that, Mr. Nilesh Kapadia was tipping off Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi before placing the orders for HDFC AMC and Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi was trading on the basis of the same. Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi was also reporting back to Mr. Nilesh Kapadia on the quantity executed by him, price details etc. Mr. Nilesh Kapadia and Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi after being confronted with the documents collected during the investigation, have admitted to their wrongdoing in their recorded statements under oath before the Investigating Authority.

6. It was found that the tips and instructions from Mr. Nilesh Kapadia to Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi were towards trading both on BSE and NSE, at times in multiple stocks within the same day. Their conversation on certain occasions also indicated that the subject matter had been discussed by them previously and the said conversation was in continuation of the same. Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi was also reporting back to Mr. Nilesh Kapadia on the trades executed on BSE and NSE. While the trades reported for NSE matched with the trades by Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi, the trades reported for BSE matched with the trades by Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta/Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta. On some days, there were no trades by Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi in the scrip referred to in his conversation with Mr. Nilesh Kapadia but the tips passed on to him have been actually executed in the account of Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta/Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta.

Mr. Uday Kulkarni, the proprietor of M/s Om Enterprises, who also used to operate one of the trading terminals of M/s Om Enterprises, has also admitted before the Investigating Authority in a recorded statement that, sometimes Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi used to place orders in the account of Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta/Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta. Incidentally, both Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi and Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta were trading from the premises of M/s Om Enterprises. Besides, Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta further stated to SEBI that he did not have any prior experience in intra-day trading or executing large number of trades and that his prior experience was limited to buying and holding stocks for long periods. Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi when confronted by the Investigating Authority of SEBI with the evidence of his reporting back to Mr. Nilesh Kapadia on the trades executed by Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta/Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta, has stated in his recorded statement that, he did not have any logical answer. 7. From a transcript of the conversation between Mr. Nilesh Kapadia and Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi on April 24, 2007, it was found that Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi was frontrunning the orders of HDFC AMC in the shares of Century Textiles Limited on NSE. It was also found that on the same date, Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta (in the account of Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta) was also frontrunning the orders of HDFC AMC in the same scrip on BSE. The relevant portion of the transcript of the conversation between Mr. Nilesh Kapadia and Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi at around 12:20 pm on the said date is given below:

Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi : Hello. Nilesh Kapadia: Aa gaya? (Did it come?) Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi : Haan 95 kar raha hoon. Ho gaya 95. 59425. (Yes doing 95, it became 95,59,425.) Nilesh Kapadia: 9425. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi : Haan. (Yes.) Nilesh Kapadia: Okay, BSE pe 70 hai na. (In BSE there is 70 right?) Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi : Haan. (Yes.) Nilesh Kapadia: Okay, bolta hoon. (Ok I will tell you.)

It is observed that at that point, Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi had completed the purchase of 95,000 shares of Century Textiles Limited on NSE and another 70,000 shares of Century Textiles Limited was already bought in the account of Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta, on BSE. There was no other account which had bought 70,000 shares of Century Textiles Limited on BSE till that moment, on that day. This apparently indicates that the trades in the account of Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta were based on the tips passed on to Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi by Mr. Nilesh Kapadia. Since Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta has admitted that he himself was operating the account of Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta, it also appears that he too was involved in the frontrunning, through his account as well as that of Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta.

8. In view of the foregoing, I arrive at the following prima facie findings:

a. Mr. Nilesh Kapadia had tipped off Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi before placing the orders for HDFC AMC and that Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi traded based on such tips and instructions. b. Th e trading accounts of Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta/Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta were also operated based on the tips received by Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi from Mr. Nilesh Kapadia.

9. In view of the preliminary findings arrived at above, the conduct of Mr. Nilesh Kapadia, Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi, Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta and Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta is prima facie in violation of Regulation 3 (a) to (d) and Regulation 4(1) and 4(2)(e) of Securities and Exchange Board of India (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Relating to Securities Market) Regulations, 2003. Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi is the karta of Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi HUF. The role of M/s Om Enterprises as well as that of HDFC AMC and the officers in charge and responsible for the conduct of its business would be further investigated and if the findings so warrant, appropriate actions shall be initiated against them.

10. Though, the instances found by the investigation had taken place in 2007, it has taken a lot of perseverance to collect the evidence and establish the connections discussed above. However, having found those details, it is imperative to identify if there were other instances by Mr. Nilesh Kapadia, as he is the equities dealer of HDFC AMC since June 2000 till date. In view of the aforesaid findings, his continuation as a dealer for HDFC AMC poses a threat to the large number of unitholders of HDFC Mutual Fund and the portfolio management clients of HDFC AMC and appears to be undesirable as such transgressions in the institutions managing public funds cannot be looked at indulgently as it would dent public confidence reposed in such institutions and cause damage to the securities market as a whole. Further, the continuance of Mr. Nilesh Kapadia and his accomplices viz., Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi, Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta and Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta in the securities market also appears undesirable in view of their acts of commissions and omissions, as discussed above. Therefore, such situations genuinely warrant intervention by SEBI, towards mitigating the extent of such transgressions and ensuring that the persons responsible do no further damage.

11. It is further noted that the interests of numerous unitholders of HDFC Mutual Fund and portfolio management clients of HDFC AMC have been compromised due to such frontrunning orchestrated by none other than the dealer of HDFC AMC. Under most circumstances, such frontrunning increases the cost of acquisition of shares or reduces the realizations from the sale of shares, for the concerned mutual fund schemes and portfolio management clients. In the instances under investigation, initially when the frontrunner/s were building up their positions, they are also trying to attain their own volume targets, in the process taking away the liquidity that would have gone to the Mutual Fund, as Mr. Nilesh Kapadia had tipped Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi instead of placing orders for HDFC AMC with the stock broker. Thus, on each of the occasions when Mr. Nilesh Kapadia had tipped Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi, he had misused his discretion as the dealer of HDFC AMC by postponing the execution of the trades for HDFC AMC. From the calculations shown in Annexure-A, it can be observed that, in most of the instances, if the trades of Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi, Mr.

Chandrakant P. Mehta and Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta are cumulated with that of HDFC AMC, the volumes finally executed by HDFC AMC for a scrip in that day could have been executed earlier and at a lower cost (for buys) or at better realizations (for sells). This, in my opinion is a reasonable approximation considering three factors viz.(a) The mind of Mr. Nilesh Kapadia was behind the frontrunners as well the trades for HDFC AMC (b) The execution strategies were similar i.e., to incur minimum impact costs and (c) the level of competency of the dealer for the broking firm executing HDFC AMC’s orders was close to that of Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi aided by Mr. Nilesh Kapadia himself. In terms of Regulation 25(3) of Securities and Exchange Board of India (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996 “The asset management company shall be responsible for the acts of commission or omission by its employees ….”. Therefore, HDFC AMC is also responsible for the acts of its employee Mr. Nilesh Kapadia. Further, Regulation 25(16) thereof, prescribes that, the asset management company shall abide by the Code of Conduct as specified in the Fifth Schedule. In terms of Clause 8 of the Code of Conduct specified in the Fifth Schedule to the aforesaid Regulations, an asset management company shall maintain high standards of integrity and fairness in all their dealings and in the conduct of their business.

12. Under these circumstances, I, in exercise of the powers conferred upon me under Section 19 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act 1992, read with Sections 11, 11B and 11(4)(b) thereof and Regulation 11 of Securities and Exchange Board of India (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Relating to Securities Market) Regulations, 2003, by way of this ad interim ex-parte order, hereby direct as follows:

i. HDFC Asset Management Company Limited shall not utilize the services of Mr. Nilesh Kapadia for the trading activities done on behalf of HDFC Asset Management Company Limited and shall institute an internal inquiry to be conducted by the trustees of HDFC Mutual Fund in the matter.

ii. Mr. Nilesh Kapadia and HDFC Asset Management Company Limited shall jointly deposit the estimated losses identified so far as per Annexure-A of this order, to the Trustees of HDFC Mutual Fund. This amount shall be held by the Trustees in an account segregated for this purpose, till further orders by Securities and Exchange Board of India in this matter.

iii. The Trustees of HDFC Mutual Fund shall also set up an investigation committee to examine all transactions/dealings by Mr. Nilesh Kapadia, in his position as the dealer of HDFC Asset Management Company Limited, to identify whether he had indulged in similar frontrunning activities on other occasions. The committee shall submit the final report to the Securities and Exchange Board of India within six months of this order explaining any such instances.

iv. The Trustees of HDFC Mutual Fund shall, within a period of one month from the date of this order, submit a plan to overhaul the internal control systems and the internal preventive measures of HDFC Asset Management Company Limited, to avoid such instances in future.

v. Mr. Nilesh Kapadia (Permanent Account Number AABPK0356Q) is prohibited from buying, selling or dealing in securities, directly or indirectly, or being associated with any intermediary or any entity registered with the Securities and Exchange Board of India, till further orders.

vi. Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi (Permanent Account Number AAVPS8908E), Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi HUF (Permanent Account Number AAAHR3188Q), Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta (Permanent Account Number AABPM4190Q) and Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta (Permanent Account Number AHKPM9167B) are prohibited from buying, selling or dealing in securities, directly or indirectly, till further orders.

vii. Further, Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi, Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta and Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta shall, within fifteen days of this order, deposit the illegitimate gain identified so far in the investigations, as shown in the tables in paragraph 4 above, with the National Stock Exchange of India Limited which shall hold the amount in an escrow account till further orders by the Securities and Exchange Board of India in this matter.

13. This order shall come into force with immediate effect.

14. Copies of this Order shall be forwarded to HDFC Asset Management Company Limited, Trustees of HDFC Mutual Fund, National Stock Exchange of India Limited, Bombay Stock Exchange Limited, National Securities Depository Limited and Central Depository Services (India) Limited for necessary compliance with the directions issued in this order.

15. The entities/persons against whom the aforesaid directions are issued may file their objections, if any, to this Order, within fifteen days and, if they so desire, avail an opportunity of personal hearing before the Securities and Exchange Board of India, SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C4-A, ‘G’ Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai- 400051, on a date and time to be fixed on a specific request.

DR. K. M. ABRAHAM WHOLE TIME MEMBER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA PLACE: MUMBAI DATE: JUNE 17, 2010

Annexure -A: Estimated losses by the Mutual Fund Schemes/clients of the HDFC AMC.

Traded value for the same volume if Sl Total volume there was no Estimated N by HDFC (lac Traded value front-running loss in Rs. o Trade Date Scrip Exchange shares) (in Rs. lac) in Rs. lac) lac) 1 13-Apr-07 ICRA NSE 2.65 1708.29535 1678.4095 29.88585 2 13-Apr-07 ICRA BSE 1.8 1165.59364 1137.37188 28.22176 3 19-Apr-07 ZEEL NSE 2.9 764.6963 779.74395 15.04765 4 19-Apr-07 ZEEL BSE 1.35 356.24909 361.71014 5.46105 5 24-Apr-07 CENTURYTEX NSE 5.3 3214.67732 3193.1732 21.50412 6 24-Apr-07 CENTURYTEX BSE 1.7 1030.66028 1019.30585 11.35443 7 3-May-07 DISHTV NSE 4.9 556.42175 546.62427 9.79748 8 3-May-07 DISHTV BSE 2.65 300.88855 295.47763 5.41092 9 3-May-07 ICICIBANK BSE 1 866.18934 868.37762 2.18828 10 8-May-07 BHARTIARTL NSE 2.15 1769.93992 1773.9476 4.00768 11 8-May-07 BHARTIARTL BSE 0.65 533.7879 535.16231 1.37441 12 9-May-07 HTMEDIA NSE 4.7 955.46187 946.24779 9.21408 13 9-May-07 HTMEDIA BSE 2.35 476.82336 474.8527 1.97066 14 10-May-07 TATAELXSI NSE 0.57 180.57961 183.95777 3.37816 15 10-May-07 UNIPHOS NSE 1.19 352.2698 354.48082 2.21102 16 10-May-07 TATAELXSI BSE 0.43 136.28991 138.11971 1.8298 17 11-May-07 RIL BSE 1.25 1984.66534 1984.75644 No Losses 18 12-Jun-07 DISHMAN BSE 1.92 579.04267 578.3986 0.64407 19 12-Jun-07 UNI. PHOS BSE 0.45 122.91182 122.21761 0.69421 20 12-Jun-07 AMTEK AUTO BSE 0.35 149.33592 147.02518 2.31074 21 15-Jun-07 UNIPHOS NSE 1.47 441.66408 438.07887 3.58521 22 26-Jun-07 RPL NSE 34 3602.389 3594.83362 7.55538 23 26-Jun-07 RPL BSE 15 1589.86288 1585.29134 4.57154 24 16-Jul-07 SBIN NSE 0.92 1457.79412 1454.26848 3.52564 25 16-Jul-07 DISHTV BSE 3.5 346.79869 348.09519 1.2965 26 16-Jul-07 SBIN BSE 0.43 681.45565 679.78142 1.67423 27 17-Jul-07 ZEENEWS NSE 13 658.10311 657.79908 0.30403 28 17-Jul-07 DISHTV NSE 4.75 458.56445 459.74666 1.18221 29 17-Jul-07 RIL BSE 0.7 1279.73444 1278.21159 1.52285 30 17-Jul-07 Birla 3M BSE 0.0516 105.37807 103.60839 1.76968 31 17-Jul-07 ZEENEWS BSE 8 402.80774 402.84945 No losses 32 18-Jul-07 ZEENEWS NSE 19.2 1099.16869 1081.24079 17.9279 33 18-Jul-07 ZEENEWS BSE 16.27701 936.96236 920.70324 16.25912 34 19-Jul-07 ZEENEWS BSE 4.21 288.96681 286.32691 2.6399 35 23-Jul-07 ZEENEWS BSE 1.85 127.19368 126.86064 0.33304 36 24-Jul-07 SPARC NSE 2.10111 194.051 201.29563 7.24463 37 31-Jul-07 TV TODAY BSE 3.7 572.54833 562.04445 10.50388 169.41972 31448.22284 31300.39632 238.40211

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free