Dinesh Goyal vs Prints Publication Pvt. Ltd. & Anr
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1214 of 2019
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Appellate Tribunal may, under Rule 11 of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Rules, 2016, set aside an order admitting an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and permit the operational creditor to withdraw that application, where the parties have settled, the operational creditor is satisfied with the payment of its dues, and the debt has been paid before the Committee of Creditors has been constituted.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Dinesh Goyal ...Appellant
Versus
Prints Publications Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. ...Respondents
Present: For Appellant : Mr. Pankaj Bhagat and Mr. Vijay Zaveri, Advocates
For Respondents: Mr. Kunal Kishor, Advocate for 1st Respondent
Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate for Interim Resolution Professional (2nd Respondent)
ORDER
15.11.2019 'Printers Publication Pvt. Ltd.' (Operational Creditor) filed an
application under Section 9 of the 'Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (for
short, 'the I&B Code') for initiation of the 'Corporate Insolvency Resolution
Process' against 'Goyal Books Overseas Pvt. Ltd.' (Corporate Debtor). The
Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), New Delhi Bench-V by
the impugned order dated 4th November, 2019 having admitted the application,
the present Appeal has been preferred by 'Mr. Dinesh Goyal', Director of the
'Corporate Debtor'.
Earlier, when the matter was taken up, learned counsel for the Appellant
submitted that the 'Committee of Creditors' had not been constituted and the
Appellant intends to settle the matter.
2
Today, it is informed that the parties have settled the matter. Mr. Pankaj
Bhagat, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant handed over the
Banker's Cheque No. 037850 dated 11th November, 2019 issued by the 'Axis
Bank Ltd.', Sector 62, NOIDA (U.P.) in the name of 'Prints Publication Pvt. Ltd.'
(Operational Creditor) for a total sum of Rs. 12,20,574/- to Mr. Kunal Kishor,
learned counsel appearing on behalf of the 1st Respondent (Prints Publication
Pvt. Ltd.). 1st Respondent is satisfied with the aforesaid amount as total payment
towards dues is made.
Mr. Amit Sharma, learned counsel appears on behalf of Mr. Saurabh
Agarwal, 'Interim Resolution Professional'. Learned counsel for the Appellant
handed over another Banker's Cheque No. 037866 dated 13th November, 2019
issued by 'Axis Bank Ltd.', Sector 62, NOIDA (U.P.) for a total sum of Rupees Two
Lakhs to Mr. Amit Sharma, learned counsel for the 'Interim Resolution
Professional' for onward transmission. It is stated that the 'Interim Resolution
Professional' is satisfied with the total amount which is paid towards his fees
and cost. The learned counsel for 2nd Respondent also accepts that the
'Committee of Creditors' have not yet been constituted.
In view of the fact that the parties have settled the matter and 'debt
amount' has been paid before constitution of the 'Committee of Creditors', in
exercise powers under Rule 11 of the 'National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
Rules, 2016, we set aside the impugned order dated 4th November, 2019 passed
by the Adjudicating Authority and allow 'Print Publication Pvt. Ltd. (Operational
Creditor) to withdraw the application filed under Section 9 of the 'I&B Code'
which stands disposed of as withdrawn.
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1214 of 2019 3
The Adjudicating Authority will now close the proceedings. The 'Interim
Resolution Professional' is directed to hand over the Books of Accounts etc. and
the assets of the 'Corporate Debtor' to the 'Promoter of the Corporate Debtor',
which run independently without rigour of law.
The Appeal is allowed with aforesaid directions. However, in the facts and
circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to cost.
[Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[Justice Venugopal M.] Member (Judicial)
/ns/gc
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1214 of 2019
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free