Digital IP Insights Private Limited
- CitationRBI Compounding Order CA No. NDL 466/2019
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Reserve Bank, on a compounding application, holds that an Indian company which takes on record in its books a transfer of shares from a resident shareholder to a non-resident without first obtaining the AD bank's certified Form FC-TRS contravenes Regulation 4 of FEMA 20/2000-RB, read with paragraph 6.2 of Annex to A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 16 of 4 October 2004, under which the company may record such a transfer only upon receipt of the AD bank's certificate that the remittance has been received or payment made. A contravention so established may be compounded under Section 15(1) of FEMA and the Foreign Exchange (Compounding Proceedings) Rules, 2000, the amount payable being fixed by reference to the Guidance Note on Computation Matrix in the Master Direction on Compounding of Contraventions, and the compounding being conditional on the veracity of the applicant's declarations that no enquiry, investigation, adjudication or appeal is pending, failing which the order is without prejudice to other action.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
In exercise of the powers under Section 15(1) of Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 and the Regulations/ Rules/ Notifications/ Orders made thereunder, I pass the following Order. ORDER The applicant has filed the compounding application dated May 29, 2019 (received at Reserve Bank of India, New Delhi on June 7, 2019) and addendum dated August 7, 2019 for compounding of contravention of the provisions of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as FEMA) and the regulations issued thereunder. The contravention sought to be compounded is of taking on record in its books by the applicant company, the transfer of shares by residents to non-resident without obtaining certified Form FC-TRS from the AD bank, in terms of Regulation 4 of Foreign Exchange Management (Transfer or Issue of Security by a Person Resident Outside India) Regulations, 2000 notified vide Notification No. FEMA 20/2000-RB dated May 3, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as FEMA 20/2000-RB), as amended from time to time, read with paragraph 6.2 of Annex to A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 16 dated October 4, 2004.
Digital IP Insights Private Limited CA No. NDL 466/2019
2. The relevant facts of the case are as follows: (a) The applicant company, incorporated on June 9, 2015, is engaged in the business of intellectual property protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights. (b) Shri Bharat Kapoor, a resident shareholder (the seller) of the applicant company transferred 9,999 equity shares of the applicant company to M/s Strategic IP Information Pte. Ltd., Singapore (the non-resident buyer) on July 7, 2015 for a consideration of `99,990/-. The applicant company took on record in its books the transfer of shares vide Board resolution dated July 7, 2015 without obtaining Form FC- TRS duly acknowledged/ certified by the AD bank. AD bank certified the Form FC- TRS on May 9, 2019. The applicant, thus, took the transfer on record 3 years, 10 months and 2 days prior to AD bank’s certification of Form FC-TRS, in contravention of Regulation 4 of FEMA 20/2000-RB, as then applicable, read with paragraph 6.2 of Annex to A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 16 dated October 4, 2004. Whereas, in terms of Regulation 4 of FEMA 20/2000-RB, an Indian entity shall not issue any security to a person resident outside India or shall not record in its books any transfer of security from or to such person provided that the Reserve Bank may, on an application made to it and for sufficient reasons, permit an entity to issue any security to a person resident outside India or to record in its books transfer of security from or to such person, subject to such conditions as may be considered necessary. Further, in terms of paragraph 6.2 of Annex to A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 16 dated October 4, 2004, when the transfer is on private arrangement basis, on settlement of the transactions, the transferee/ his duly appointed agent should approach the investee company to record the transfer in their books along with the certificate in the Form FC-TRS from the AD bank that the remittances have been received by the transferor/ payment has been made by the transferee. On receipt of the certificate from the AD, the company may record the transfer in its books. (c) Thus, there is a contravention of Regulation 4 of FEMA 20/2000-RB, as then applicable, read with paragraph 6.2 of Annex to A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 16 dated October 4, 2004.
3. The applicant was given an opportunity for personal hearing for further submission in person and/ or by producing documents, if any, in support of the application. Shri Neeraj Srivastava, Company Secretary, appeared for personal hearing on October 21, 2019 on behalf of the applicant. The representative admitted
Digital IP Insights Private Limited CA No. NDL 466/2019 the contravention committed by the applicant for which compounding has been sought. During the personal hearing, he submitted that the contravention was without any malafide or wilful intention but was mainly due to inadvertence. He requested for a lenient view in the matter. The application for compounding is, therefore, being considered on the basis of averments made in the application as well as other documents and submissions made during the personal hearing.
4. I have given my careful consideration to the documents on record and submissions made by the applicant during the personal hearing. Accordingly, I hold that the applicant has contravened the provisions of Regulation 4 of FEMA 20/2000- RB, as then applicable, read with paragraph 6.2 of Annex to A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 16 dated October 4, 2004, on account of taking on record by the applicant, the transfer of shares by resident to non-resident without obtaining certified Form FC-TRS from the AD bank as detailed in paragraph 2(b) above. The contravention relates to an amount of ₹99,990/- (Rupees Ninety Nine Thousand Nine Hundred and Ninety only) and the period of contravention is 3 years, 10 months and 2 days.
5. It has been declared in the compounding application dated May 29, 2019 that the particulars given by the applicant in the application are true and correct to the best of their knowledge and belief. It has also been declared in the declaration dated June 18, 2019 furnished as part of the compounding application that the applicant was not under any enquiry/ investigation/ adjudication by any agency as on the date of the application and has, in this regard, not informed of initiation of any such enquiry/ investigation/ adjudication proceedings against it, thereafter. It has further been declared that the applicant has not filed any appeal under Section 17 or Section 19 of FEMA. Accordingly, the above contravention which is being compounded in this Order is subject to the veracity of the above declarations made by the applicant and this Order is without prejudice to any other action which may be taken by any authority under the extant laws if the said declarations are subsequently discovered to be false and/ or incorrect.
6. In terms of Section 13 of FEMA, any person contravening any provision of the Act shall be liable to a penalty up to thrice the sum involved in such contravention upon adjudication. After considering the submissions made by the applicant and the entire facts and circumstances of the case I am persuaded to compound the contravention,
Digital IP Insights Private Limited CA No. NDL 466/2019 in line with the Guidance Note on Computation Matrix prescribed as part of Master Direction – Compounding of Contraventions, framed in accordance with the Foreign Exchange (Compounding Proceedings) Rules 2000. Accordingly, it stands to reason that payment of an amount of ₹13,920/- (Rupees Thirteen Thousand Nine Hundred and Twenty only) will meet the ends of justice in the circumstances of this case.
7. Accordingly, I compound the admitted contravention of Regulation 4 of FEMA 20/2000-RB, as then applicable, read with paragraph 6.2 of Annex to A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 16 dated October 4, 2004, by the applicant based on the facts detailed above in terms of the Foreign Exchange (Compounding Proceedings) Rules, 2000, on payment of an amount of ₹13,920/- (Rupees Thirteen Thousand Nine Hundred and Twenty only) which shall be deposited by the applicant with the Reserve Bank of India, Foreign Exchange Department, 6, Sansad Marg, New Delhi - 110001 by a demand draft drawn in favour of the “Reserve Bank of India” and payable at New Delhi within a period of 15 days from the date of this Order. In case of failure to deposit the compounded amount within the above mentioned period, Rule 10 of the Foreign Exchange (Compounding Proceedings) Rules, 2000 dated May 3, 2000 shall apply.
The application is disposed accordingly.
Dated this the 21st day of October 2019.
Sd/- (Md. Shakir Hasan) Assistant General Manager
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free