Delhi Development Authority vs Ishwar Singh .
- SCC(2017) 13 SCC 276
- Neutral2017 INSC 430
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where land acquisition proceedings have lapsed because compensation has not been paid to the land owner, the acquisition authority may not be permitted to continue with those proceedings, but retains the liberty to initiate fresh acquisition proceedings under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, provided such fresh proceedings are initiated within a specified period; if fresh proceedings are not initiated within that period, the authority must return physical possession of the land to the original owner.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
NON-REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6078 OF 2017 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 14419 OF 2017 ] [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) .....CC 19842 OF 2016 ]
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Appellant(s)
VERSUS
ISHWAR SINGH AND ORS. Respondent(s)
J U D G M E N T
KURIAN, J.
1. Delay condoned.
2. Leave granted.
3. Admittedly, the compensation has not been paid to
the land owner(s). Therefore, the High Court is
right in its conclusion that the proceedings have
lapsed. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.
4. However, in the peculiar facts and circumstances
of this case, the appellant is given a period of six
months to exercise its liberty granted under Section
24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and
Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and
Resettlement Act, 2013 for initiation of the
acquisition proceedings afresh.
5. We make it clear that in case no fresh Signature Not Verified
acquisition proceedings are initiated within the said Digitally signed by JAYANT KUMAR ARORA Date: 2017.05.05 12:15:15 IST Reason:
period of one year from today by issuing a
Notification under Section 11 of the Act, the 2
appellant, if in possession, shall return the
physical possession of the land to the original land
owner.
6. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
No costs.
.......................J. [ KURIAN JOSEPH ]
.......................J. [ R. BANUMATHI ]
New Delhi;
May 02, 2017.
3
ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.7 SECTION XIV
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 19842/2016
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/03/2016 in WPC No. 9125/2015 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi)
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
ISHWAR SINGH AND ORS. Respondent(s)
I.A. 1/2016 (with c/delay in filing SLP)
Date : 02/05/2017 This application was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI
For Petitioner(s) Ms. Garima Prashad, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Katyan, Adv.
Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Adv.
Mr. Avtar Singh Chouhan, Adv.
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Delay condoned.
Leave granted.
The appeal is dismissed in terms of the signed non-reportable
Judgment.
Pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed
of.
(Jayant Kumar Arora) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Assistant Registrar
(Signed non-reportable Judgment is placed on the file) 4
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free