Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Commissioner Of Sales Tax vs Northern Railway Catering Department ,U.P.

Supreme Court14 July 1994Kuldip Singh · Yogeshwar Dayal

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

Where food is supplied in an eating house or restaurant, the transaction is exigible to sales tax if the substance of the transaction, evidenced by its dominant object, is a sale of food and the rendering of service is merely incidental; it is for the taxing authority to ascertain the facts and determine whether a sale of food is intended. The legal position regarding the taxability of catering services was altered by the Constitution (46th) Amendment Act, 1982, which came into force on 3 February 1983, and therefore prior orders based on the law before that amendment required reconsideration.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

PETITIONER:COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX
Vs.
RESPONDENT:NORTHERN RAILWAY CATERING DEPARTMENT ,U.P.
DATE OF JUDGMENT14/07/1994
BENCH:KULDIP SINGH (J)BENCH:KULDIP SINGH (J)YOGESHWAR DAYAL (J)
CITATION:1995 AIR 93 1994 SCC (5) 358JT 1994 (5) 73 1994 SCALE (3)260
ACT:
HEADNOTE:
JUDGMENT:

The Judgement of the Court was delivered by KULDIP SINGH, J.-This Court in Northern India Caterers (india) Ltd. v. Lt. Governor of Delhi1 held that service of meals whether in a hotel or resturant does not constitute a sale of good for the purpose of levy of sales tax. Following the law laid down by this Court in Northern India Caters' case1 the Allahabad High Court by its order dated 13-12-1979 disposed of Sales Tax Revision Nos. 838,837,532 and 533 of 1979 by holding that the catering done by the Northern Railway stations was not 359 exigible to sales tax. This Court had meanwhile by its order dated 21-12-1979, clarified the judgment in Northern India Caterers' case2 to the following effect:

"Indeed, we have no hesitation in saying that where food is supplied in an eating house or restaurant, and it is established upon the facts that the substance of the transaction, evidenced by its dominant object is a sale of food and the rendering of service is merely incidental, the transaction would undoubtedly be exigible to sales tax. In every case it will be for the, taxing authority to ascertain the facts when making an assessment under the relevant sales tax law and to determine upon these facts whether a sale of the food supplied is intended."

2. The Commissioner of Sales Tax, U.P., Lucknow, thereafter filed Miscellaneous Application Nos. 9, 10, 11 and 12 of 1980 before the Allahabad High Court for review of the order dated 13-12-1979. The High Court dismissed the applications on the ground that the same were not maintainable. These appeals by way of special leave are against the order of the High Court.

3. It is not necessary for us to go into the question as to whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the review applications filed by the appellant. Apart from the clarification dated 21-12-1979 given by this Court the legal position has been altogether changed by the Constitution (46th) Amendment Act, 1982 which came into force with effect from 3-2-1983.

4. We, therefore, set aside the impugned order of the High Court dated 19-3-1982, allow the review applications filed by the Commissioner of Sales Tax, U.P., Lucknow before the High Court and set aside the order dated 13-12-1979 passed by the High Court in sales tax revisions. We remand the case to the Sales Tax Officer concerned who will hold the assessment proceedings afresh in accordance with law. The appeals are allowed in the above terms. No costs.

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free