Colonel Krishna Kumar Singh vs Sebi
- CitationAppeal No. 431 of 2015
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
A person against whom an adverse order is proposed to be passed by SEBI is entitled to receive a show cause notice before the order is passed, and this entitlement is not displaced by the fact that the person is a current director of the company concerned.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Date of Decision : 06.04.2018
Misc. Application No. 340 of 2015 And Appeal No. 431 of 2015
Colonel Krishna Kumar Singh H. No. 622, 2nd Floor, Skylark Apartments, Plot No. 35, Sector No. 6, Dwarka, ...Appellant New Delhi - 110 075.
Versus [[
1.
Securities and Exchange Board of India Assistant General Manager, Northern Regional Office, 5th Floor, Bank of Baroda Building, 16, Sansad Marg, Mumbai - 110 001.
2. Securities and Exchange Board of India, SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G-Block, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), ...Respondents Mumbai - 400 051.
CORAM : Justice J.P. Devadhar, Presiding Officer Dr. C.K.G. Nair, Member
Per : Justice J.P. Devadhar (Oral)
1. This appeal is filed to challenge the order passed by the Whole Time
Member ('WTM' for short) of Securities and Exchange Board of India
('SEBI' for short) on August 14, 2015.
2. Basic grievance of the appellant is that the impugned order is passed
without issuing a Show Cause Notice ('SCN' for short) to the appellant.
2 3. Counsel for SEBI fairly states that in the present case SCN was not
issued to the appellant because he is the current director of the company.
4. In our opinion, even a current director is entitled to receive a SCN
before any order could be passed against him.
5. In this view of the matter, impugned order is quashed and set aside
qua the appellant with liberty to the SEBI to issue SCN to the appellant, if
deemed fit.
6. Appeal is disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs.
7. In view of the disposal of the appeal, the Misc. Application No. 340
of 2015 becomes infructuous and is disposed of accordingly with no order
as to costs.
Sd/-
Justice J.P. Devadhar Presiding Officer
Sd/-
Dr. C.K.G. Nair Member 06.04.2018 Prepared and compared by:msb
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free