Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Collector Of Customs, Bombay vs Business Forms Ltd. Thr. O.L.

Supreme Court15 January 2002U.C. Banerjee · Bisheshwar Prasad Singh

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

Where the Central Excise Tariff Act is enacted on the basis and pattern of the Harmonized System of Nomenclature (HSN), expressions used in the Act must, as far as practicable, be construed to have the meaning expressly given to them in the HSN when there is no indication in the Indian Tariff of a different intention, and consequently the explanatory notes to the HSN are entitled to significant weight in tariff classification and cannot be dismissed as having merely persuasive value. Where the Appellate Tribunal has overlooked evidence that the Collector (Appeals) relied upon HSN explanatory notes, and has failed to accord proper weight to those notes in its reasoning, the matter must be remanded to the Tribunal for fresh consideration with all contentions available to the parties.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

ORDER

1. These civil appeals arise on orders of the customs, excise and gold (control), appellate tribunal and they have to be allowed and the matters remanded for re- consideration by that tribunal because, principally, the tribunal has declined to place reliance upon the explanatory notes in the H.S.N. stating that, at best, these have only persuasive value.

2. This Court in Collector of Central Excise, Shillong v. Wood Craft Products Limited has said:

"We are of the view that the Tribunal as well as the High Court fell into the error of over- looking the fact that the structure of the central excise tariff is based on the internationally accepted nomenclature found in the HSN and, therefore, be resolved with reference to the nomenclature indicated by the HSN unless there be an express different intention indicated by the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 itself. The definition of a term in the ISI glossary, which has a different purpose, cannot, in case of a conflict, override the clear indication of the meaning of an identical expression in the same context in the HSN. In the HSN, block board is included within the meaning of the expression 'similar laminated wood' in the same context of classification of block board. Since the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 is enacted on the basis and pattern of the HSN, the same expression used in the Act must as far as practicable, be construed to have the meaning which is expressly given to it in the HSN when there is no indication in the Indian Tariff of a different intention."

Clearly, therefore, the HSN explanatory notes are entitled to far greater consideration than the tribunal has given there.

3. The tribunal has also said that the collector (appeals) had not relied upon the HSN explanatory notes. That was clearly an oversight of the tribunal because its order says, earlier, thus "The collector (appeals) held that the photographic apparatus, as has been imported, for making printing blocks were excluded from chapter heading 84.38 vide explanatory notes to CCOM at page 1288."

4. The civil appeals are, therefore, allowed. The orders under appeal are set aside. The appeals before the tribunal are restored to it for being heard and disposed of afresh. All contentions shall be available to the parties thereto.

5. No order as to costs.

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free