C.D. Korpal vs Capt. A.K. Madan And Ors.
- SCC(1982) 3 SCC 375
- AIRAIR 1982 SC 1455
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where an eviction suit is filed on the ground of bona fide personal requirement, leave to defend must be granted to the tenant even if the ground is disputed, rather than refusing leave to defend without affording the tenant an opportunity to contest the claim.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
2. This is an appeal by special leave directed against an order dated 3-8-1981 passed by the Delhi High Court rejecting a revision application preferred by the appellant against the order of the Addl. Rent Controller, Delhi refusing to grant leave to the appellant to defend a suit for eviction filed against him by the respondents. The respondents claimed eviction of the appellant on the ground of bona fide personal requirement. The appellant was refused leave to defend the suit for eviction even though the ground on which the eviction was sought was bona fide personal requirement and this ground was disputed by the appellant. We are of the view that this is a fit case in which leave to defend should have been granted by the Addl. Rent Controller and an opportunity should have been afforded to the appellant to defend the suit. We accordingly allow the appeal, set aside the order passed by the High Court as also the order made by the Addl. Rent Controller and grant leave to the appellant to defend the suit. The appellant and the respondents will appear before the Addl. Rent Controller on Jan. 25, 1982 for taking appropriate directions from him in regard to the hearing of the suit. The appellant is directed to file his written statement peremptorily; on or before 28th Jan. 1982 and in no case will he be granted time for filing She written statement beyond the period allowed by us and if the appellant does not file the written statement on or before 28th Jan. 1982, the Addl. Rent Controller may proceed ex parte against the appellant. There will be discovery and inspection within one week after the filing of the written statement. The Addl. Rent Controller will lake up the suit for hearing and final disposal not later than 15th Feb. 1982 and will proceed with the hearing of the suit from day to day as far as possible and will dispose of the suit by judgment or compromise, as the ease may be, not later than 21st Mar 1982. The directions given by us are peremptory directions and they shall be carried out strictly and faithfully. There will be no order as to Costs in this appeal.
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free