Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Broadcast Engineering Consultants ... vs Mr. Rohit Mehra

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal3 November 2025Ashok Bhushan

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The appellate jurisdiction of the Tribunal under Section 61(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, to condone delay in filing an appeal against an order approving a resolution plan is confined to a period of fifteen days beyond the prescribed period of limitation; where the delay exceeds that condonable period, the Tribunal has no power to condone it and the delay condonation application must be dismissed, whatever explanation is offered for the delay.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHICompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1337 of 2025& I.A. No. 5219 of 2025In the matter of:

Broadcast Engineering Consultants India Ltd. ....Appellant Vs.

Rohit Ramesh Mehra & Ors. ...Respondents For Appellant Mr. Uddyam Mukherjee, Ms. Shruti Sharma, Mr. Swapnil Pattanayak, Mr. Nishant Kandpal, Mr. Agnibha Chatterjee, Advocates. For Respondents

ORDER

(Hybrid Mode)

03.11.2025: I.A. No. 5219 of 2025:- This is an application praying for

condonation of 383 days delay in filing the Appeal. The order impugned was passed

on 06.05.2024 by which Resolution Plan was approved. This Appeal has been e-filed

on 23.06.2025. Counsel for the Appellant submitted that the Appellant was not aware

of the order, hence, he could not file the Appeal. In paragraph 2 of the application,

following has been stated:-

"2. The Impugned Order was communicated to the Appellant by the Resolution Professional vide an email dated 16.05.2024."

2. According to own case of the Appellant that he came to know about the order

on 16.05.2024. Filing of the Appeal after one year thereafter cannot be any basis for

condonation of delay. Furthermore, our jurisdiction to condone the delay is limited to

15 days as per Section 61(2) proviso. The delay being beyond condonable period, the 2

delay condonation application cannot be allowed. Delay condonation application is

dismissed. Memo of appeal is also rejected.

[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson

[Barun Mitra] Member (Technical) Anjali/md

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1337 of 2025 & I.A. No. 5219 of 2025

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free