Bir Singh vs Ram Kanwar Singh(D) Th. Lrs
- SCC(2018) 15 SCC 341
- Neutral2018 INSC 754
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
A usufructuary mortgagee cannot acquire ownership of the mortgaged property by prescription or by claiming that the mortgagor's right has been foreclosed merely upon the expiry of the statutory period; the mortgagee's right is limited to the usufruct and does not extend to ownership of the property.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
NON-REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL No(s). 8994 of 2018 (Arising out of SLP(C)No.37997 of 2013)
BIR SINGH Appellant(s)
VERSUS
RAM KANWAR SINGH(D) TH. LRS & ORS. Respondent(s)
J U D G M E N T
BANUMATHI, J.:
1. Leave granted.
2. The appellant claims through the original mortgagee under
the usufructuary mortgage. The appellant-mortgagee filed a
suit claiming ownership of the property in-question by
prescription and also sought for permanent injunction in favour
of the appellant. The trial court decreed the suit and granted
permanent injunction. On appeal, the first appellate court
partly allowed the appeal holding that the appellant, claiming
through the mortgagee, cannot claim right to ownership over the
property in-question. However, the first appellate court
affirmed the permanent injunction in favour of the appellant in
the capacity of the appellant as a mortgagee. The same view
was affirmed by the High Court. However, the High Court
granted liberty to the respondents to work out their remedy for Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by MAHABIR SINGH Date: 2018.08.30
right to redemption in separate proceedings.
17:56:36 IST Reason: While doing so
the High Court affirmed the grant of injunction in favour of
the appellant.
2
3. The short question involved in this appeal is whether the
appellant, being the mortgagee, can claim grant of ownership by
contending that the right of morgagor has been foreclosed.
4. This issue is squarely covered by a judgment of this Court
in Singh Ram (Dead) Thr. Legal Representatives v. Sheo Ram and
Others, (2014) 9 SCC 185 where this Court held that “A
usufructuary mortgagee is not entitled to file a suit for
declaration that he had become an owner merely on the expiry of
30 years from the date of the mortgage”.
5. In view of above, this appeal is dismissed.
..........................J. (R. BANUMATHI)
..........................J. (VINEET SARAN) NEW DELHI, AUGUST 28, 2018.
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free