Bhagwam Rama Shinde Gosai And Ors vs State Of Gujarat
- SCC(1999) 4 SCC 421
- Neutral1999 INSC 246
- AIRAIR 1999 SC 1859
- SCR[1999] 3 SCR 545
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
When a convicted person sentenced to a fixed period of imprisonment files an appeal under statutory right, an appellate court should consider suspension of sentence liberally unless there are exceptional circumstances or statutory restrictions against suspension; where the appellate court is unable to dispose of the appeal expeditiously due to practical reasons, it should exercise special concern in suspending the sentence to make the right of appeal meaningful and effective, and may impose stringent conditions such as reporting requirements or bail conditions to do so.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
The following Order of the Court was delivered : Leave granted.
This is a case where appellants have been convicted by the trial court of the offence under Section 392 read with Section 397 and each of Them was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 10 years. They filed an appeal before the High Court of Gujarat and moved for suspension of sentence, but that was not allowed. At a later stage they again moved for suspension of sentence and that too was dismissed by the impugned order. Unfortunately, when they made a motion for having their appeal expedited that also was declined by the High Court on the premise that the High Court is having older appeals on the board.
When a convicted person is sentenced to fixed period of sentence and when he files appeal under any statutory right, suspension of sentence can be considered by the appellate court liberally unless there are exceptional circumstances. Of course if there is any statutory restriction against suspension of sentence it is a different matter. Similarly, when the sentence is life imprisonment the consideration for suspension of sentence could be of a different approach. But if for any reason the sentence of limited duration cannot be suspended every endeavour should be made to dispose of the appeal on merits more so when motion for expeditious hearing the appeal is made in such cases. Otherwise the very valuable right of appeal would be an exercise in futility by efflux of time. When the appellate court finds that due to practical reasons such appeals cannot be disposed of expeditiously the appellate court must bestow special concern in the matter suspending the sentence, so as to make the appeal right meaningful and effective. Of course appellate courts can impose similar conditions when bail is granted.
In this case as the High Court was not inclined to hear the appeal expeditiously we are of the view that the sentence passed on appellants can be suspended on some stringent conditions. We, therefore, suspend the sentence and direct the appellants to be released on bail on each of them executing a bond to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, Nadiad. We direct the appellants to report to Kapadwang Police Station on all Mondays and Thursdays between 4.00 P.M. and 6.00 P.M. until disposal of the appeal pending before the High Court.
This appeal is disposed of in the above terms.
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free