Beacon Trusteeship Ltd & Anr vs Earthcon Infracon Pvt. Ltd. & Anr
- CitationCompany Appeal(AT) (Insolvency) No. 1175 of 2019
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where the Supreme Court has stayed the proceedings under an NCLT order pending its own decision, the Adjudicating Authority is not to pass an order in those proceedings while the stay remains in operation, and any order so passed is to be disregarded. The Appellate Tribunal will not examine on merits an order of the Adjudicating Authority passed while a stay by the Supreme Court is in operation; the appeal against such an order is disposed of with liberty to the appellants to seek appropriate relief before the Adjudicating Authority once the Supreme Court has decided the pending appeal.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Beacon Trusteeship and Anr. ...Appellants
Vs
Earthcon Infracon Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. ....Respondents Present: For Appellants: Mr. Shikhil Suri and Ms. Nikita Thapar, Advocates For Respondents: S Sharma, Advocate for IRP
ORDER
08.11.2019 Heard Advocate Mr. Shikhil Suri appearing on behalf of the
Appellants and Advocate S. Sharma appearing on behalf of IRP. In this matter,
against the order of dated 23.08.2019 (page 67) NCLT admitting application
under Section 9 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (In short 'IBC') in the
matter of M/s Emperos Infrastructure Private Ltd. Vs. M/s Earthcon Infracon
Private Limited, it is stated that the Appellant had moved Hon'ble Supreme Court
of India in Civil Appeal No. 7641 of 2019 and Hon'ble Supreme Court passed the
following order:
"UPON hearing the Counsel the Court made the following
ORDER
Issue notice, returnable in three weeks.
Steps for service of notice be taken within three days. In case the
steps are not taken within the stipulated time, the civil appeal shall
stand dismissed.
The proceedings in terms of NCLT Order dated 23.08.2019 shall
remain stayed till the next date of hearing."
Company Appeal(AT)(Insolvency) No. 1175 of 2019 Page 1 of 3
2. It is stated that before the Hon'ble Supreme Court's order dated
30.09.2019 was passed, Committee of Creditors had taken a decision on
23.09.2019 to replace the Interim Resolution Professional by another person to
be appointed as Resolution Professional and application C.A. 384/ND/2019
(Annexure-4) had already been filed before the Adjudicating Authority on
27.09.2019 on behalf of Committee of Creditors.
3. It appears now that the Adjudicating Authority has passed the following
order on 09.10.2019(Annexure-A1) which reads as follows:
"ORDER
"CA No. 384/ND/2019 is an application filed by two applicant's
M/s Becaon Trusteeship Limited and M/s Nislis Finance and
Investment Managers LLP. From the list of creditors, it is seen
that in respect of M/s Beacon Trusteeship Limited, no amount is
admitted and no voting in the voting sheet is reflected. In view of
the same, the application is defective. Over and above, the
learned counsel appearing for the IRP places the order of Hon'ble
Supreme Court dated 30.09.2019 staying all the proceedings in
terms of Hon'ble NCLT order dated 23.08.2019 till the next date
of hearing. The learned Counsel appearing for the applicant's
states that the next date of hearing before the Hon'ble Supreme
Court after three weeks from the date of last order i.e.
30.09.2019.
The application does not reflected the correct picture of
applicants.
Company Appeal(AT)(Insolvency) No. 1175 of 2019 Page 2 of 3 In views of the same, application is dismissed."
4. Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that the observations made by
the Adjudicating Authority against the Appellants were uncalled for.
5. The order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, stayed the proceedings
in terms of the NCLT Order dated 23.08.2019. As such, till the order passed by
Hon'ble Supreme Court is in operation, Adjudicating Authority should not have
passed the Impugned Order.
6. In the present appeal arising out of impugned order dated 09.10.2019, we
refrain to analyse the Impugned Order on merits keeping in views orders passed
by the Hon'ble Supreme Court dated 30.09.2019 and ignore the Impugned
Order.
7. We dispose of the present appeal with liberty to the Appellants to move
before the Adjudicating Authority for appropriate relief regarding replacement of
I.R.P. after the Hon'ble Supreme Court takes decision in the appeal which is
stated to be pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
[Justice A.I.S. Cheema] Member (Judicial)
(Kanthi Narahari) Member(Technical)
(V P Singh) Member(Technical) Akc/Gc
Company Appeal(AT)(Insolvency) No. 1175 of 2019 Page 3 of 3
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free