Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Aviral Bhatla vs Bhawna Bhatla

Supreme Court18 February 2009Asok Kumar Ganguly · Arijit Pasayat

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

Where parties to matrimonial and related criminal and civil disputes enter into a comprehensive settlement, the Supreme Court may exercise its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution to grant a decree of divorce by mutual consent and to quash all criminal and civil proceedings arising from the matrimonial dispute, thereby giving effect to the settled consensus of the parties.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
TRANSFER PETITION (CRL.) NO. 431 OF 2008

Aviral Bhatla ..Petitioner

Versus

Bhawna Bhatla ..Respondent

(With T.P. (C) No. 1052 of 2008)

JUDGMENT

Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.

1. These transfer petitions have been filed by Aviral Bhatla (hereinafter

referred to as the `husband') seeking transfer of several cases pending before

learned Chief Judge, Family Court, Gwalior, in proceedings under Section 9 of

the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (in short the `Act') and Section 125 of the Code

of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the `Code'). The parties were married on

20.1.2006 at Surajkund, Haryana. It appears that there were some irreconcilable differences between the parties and despite concerted and serious efforts the

parties were not able to resolve their disputes and were living separately since

10.10.2007. It appears that after the transfer petitions were filed before this

Court, learned counsel for the parties made efforts to bring about a

comprehensive settlement of the disputes relating to the matrimonial discord.

The Mediation Centre of the Delhi High Court also played a vital role in

arriving at a settlement. The details of the litigations between the parties are as

follows:

(i) The petitioner has filed a case/petition under Section 13

(1)(ia) read with Section (iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

titled Aviral Bhatla v. Bhawna Bhatla bearing case No.48/07

which is pending in the court of Mr. Ashok Bhardwaj, ASG

Gurgaon, Haryana.

(ii) Respondent has filed a case under The Protection of

Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 being complaint

case no. 3086/1/2007 dated 03.11.07, under section 12 of the

Domestic Violence Act, which is pending in the court of Ms.

Veena Rani Metropolitan Magistrate at Patiala House, New

Delhi.

2 (iii) Respondent has filed a petition for restitution of conjugal

rights under section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 in

Gwalior bearing No. 501(a)/07 against the Petitioner pending

before Ms. Saroj Maheshwari Jain, Chief Judge, Family Court,

Gwalior. The said proceedings have been stayed by this

Hon'ble Court in the Transfer Petition No. 1052/2008.

(iv) Respondent has filed a petition u/s 125 Criminal Procedure

Code, 1973 being case No.435 of 2007 titled as Bhavna Bhatla

v. Aviral Bhatla, pending before Ms. Saroj Maheshwari Jain,

Chief Judge, Family Court, Gwalior(MP). The Petitioner has

filed a transfer petition for the transfer of this matter bearing

Transfer Petition No. 431/2008 and such proceeding has been

stayed by this Court in the Transfer Petition No. 431/2008.

(v) Respondent has filed an FIR bearing No. 68/2007 dated

26.11.2007, against Petitioner and his family members under

Section 406 r/w 34 and 498A of the IPC read with section 4 of

Dowry Prohibition Act which is pending investigation in

Mahila Police Station Padav, Gwalior.

3 (vi) That petitioner's father has filed a case bearing Case No. 18664/1/08 titled as MK Bhatla V. Chitvan Sharma & ors. u/s 420, 465 468, 471 and 120B pending before the Court of Mr. Sudesh Kumar MM Patiala House, New Delhi.

(vii) The Petitioner has filed two Transfer Petitions bearing TP (C) no. 1052 of 2008 and TP (Cr1) No.431 of 2008 before this Court inter alia praying transfer of the petition u/s 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 filed by the Respondent pending before the Chief Judge, Family Court at Gwalior and transfer of proceedings under section 125 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 filed by Respondent pending before the Chief Judge, Family Court at Gwalior (MP).

The agreed terms of settlement are as follows:

"That the Petitioner agrees and undertakes that he shall pay an amount of Rs.12 lacs (Rupees Twelve Lacs) to Respondent in the form of a Pay Order in favour of Ms. Bhavna Bhatla, at the time of making of statements/grant of divorce/quashing of all the criminal and civil proceedings as a full and final settlement of all her claims. Further more the petitioner agrees and undertakes to hand over all the household articles as mentioned in settlement agreement dated 14. 11.08 before Ld. Mediator of High Court of Delhi in the presence of both the parties, which

4 are lying at House no. E-8/10, 3rd Floor, Malviya Nagar, New Delhi, within 7 days from the date of signing of the present petition, the same will be collected by the respondent and the expenses for the transportation will be borne by her.

The respondent agrees and undertakes that after the receipt of Rs.12 lacs, she and/or any of her family member will have no claim on account of alimony (past, present and future), maintenance, dowry, stridhan or will have no right of claim on any of the property movable or immovable, self acquired, ancestral, joint or HUF of the petitioner or his parents, or his family for any past, present or future claims which have all been settled in terms of the present Consent Terms. Similarly, petitioner and his family members will also have no claim against the respondent and her family members.

That both the parties agree and undertake that all the cases/complaints in any forum or court which have been filed by the parties and their family members against each other including the ones listed above will be treated as compromised and settled in terms of the present application of divorce by mutual consent under Article 142 of the Constitution of India and this Court may also pass order for quashing of Criminal proceedings as mentioned above."

5 2. In view of the factual situation and the settlement arrived at by the

parties we direct that a decree of divorce by mutual consent be passed. All the

proceedings referred to above which are pending shall stand quashed. We

record our appreciation for the effective manner in which the Mediation Centre

of Delhi High Court helped the parties to arrive at a settlement.

3. The transfer petitions are accordingly disposed of.

........................................J. (Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT)

........................................J. (ASOK KUMAR GANGULY) New Delhi, February 18, 2009

6

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free