Ajay Dhupar vs Niil Infrastructure Private Limited & ...

IN THE MATTER OF: Ajay Dhupar ...Appellant

Versus

NIIL Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondents

Present: For Appellant : Appearance not marked

For Respondents : Mr. Abhirup Das Gupta, Ms. Srishti Juneja, Mr. Dhananjay Patel, Ms. Vagisha Tiwari, Ms. Surbhi Sachdeva, Advocates for R-8 Mr. Pranjit Bhattacharya, Ms. Nitya Prabhakar, Ms. Shambhavi Tripathi & Mr. Ankit Agarwal, Advocates for R-6

ORDER

(Hybrid Mode)

07.09.2026 This appeal was taken as the first case in the morning,

however, despite giving multiple calls no one appears for the appellant. However,

Learned Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 6 and 8 are present. In the interest of

justice, we pass over the matter to be taken up in the revised list.

When the matter was taken up in the revised list at about 03:30 P.M.,

nobody appeared on behalf of the Appellant, we called the appeal multiple times,

however, all the times the Appellant was not represented before us, while Learned

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 6 & 8 remained available all the time.

There is no request either from Appellant to adjourn the case.

In view of above, it reflects that the Appellant has lost interest in prosecuting

the Appeal.

Page 1|2 Having regard to the above facts and circumstances, the appeal filed by the

Appellant is dismissed for want of prosecution.

[Justice Mohammad Faiz Alam Khan] Member (Judicial)

[Naresh Salecha] Member (Technical) KS/MR

Page 2|2