Airports Authority Of India vs Commissioner Of Service Tax

2025 INSC 1141 NON-REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 17405/2017 AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA …APPELLANT(S)

VERSUS

COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX …RESPONDENT(S)

JUDGMENT

PANKAJ MITHAL, J.

1. Heard Mr. Y. K. Kapur, learned counsel for the appellant

and Ms. Nisha Bagchi, learned senior counsel for the

respondent.

2. This is an appeal under Section 35L of the Central Excise

Act, 1944, against the judgment and order dated

01.03.2017 pronounced by Customs, Excise & Service Tax

Signature Not Verified Appellate Tribunal1 in Service Tax Appeal No. 913 of 20102. Digitally signed by SNEHA DAS Date: 2025.09.23 17:46:52 IST Reason: 1 In short ‘CESTAT’ 2 M/s Airport Authority of India Vs. CST, Delhi 1

3. The appellant-Airports Authority of India, is a Government

of India organization under the Ministry of Civil Aviation

and is engaged in managing various airports in India. It is

registered with the Service Tax Department for payment of

service tax.

4. The appellant in discharge of its duties, handle cargo on

airports including export cargo which involves a number

of activities like unloading, carting, X-ray, export packing,

etc. These services are rendered from the time the cargo is

accepted for shipment till it is placed on the aircraft.

5. The Commissioner (Adjudication), Service Tax, Delhi vide

order dated 17.03.2010 confirmed the service tax liability

upon the appellant for the period 01.10.2003 to

31.03.2007 under the category of “Storage and

Warehousing Service” up to 09.09.2004 and w.e.f.

10.09.2004 under the category “Airport Services”.

6. The aforesaid order was assailed by the appellant in an

appeal before the CESTAT, which has been disposed of by

the order impugned, confirming the service tax liability

under the category “Airport Services” with effect from

10.09.2004.

2

7. Mr. Y. K. Kapur, learned counsel appearing for the

appellant, submitted that the services on which the service

tax has been confirmed are all relating to handling of

export cargo and as such, stand excluded under Sub-

section (23) of Section 65 of the Finance Act,19943.

8. Learned counsel for the appellant emphasized upon the

Proviso to Sub-section (23) of Section 65 of the Act to

submit that the handling of export cargo is excluded from

the “cargo handling service” and as such, is not covered

under the taxable service as defined under Sub-section

(105) of Section 65 of the Act.

9. At the outset, it would be pertinent to point out that

Section 65 of the Act is not the charging section but a

provision defining various terms in connection with the

service tax. Sub-section (23) of Section 65 of the Act simply

defines “cargo handling service”. It inter alia provides that

services of loading, unloading, packing and unpacking of

cargo including certain other services would amount to

“cargo handling services” but would not include handling

of export cargo. In other words, handling of export cargo

3 Hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’

3 stands excluded from the definition of “cargo handling

service”. The aforesaid provision does not speak about

charging of service tax upon cargo handling service.

10. In order to examine whether the services rendered by the

appellant at the airport in handling the export cargo are

exempted from service tax, it would be prudent to first refer

to Section 66 of the Act, which is the charging section.

11. Section 66 of the Act envisages levying of “Service Tax” at

the rate of twelve per cent of the value of “taxable services”,

as referred to in the sub-clauses therein including sub-

clause (zzm) of Sub-section (105) of Section 65 of the Act.

12. Initially, only three types of services were referred in the

sub-clauses and were chargeable to service tax. With time,

the services chargeable to service tax were increased, and

a large number of other services were added to it.

13. “Taxable services” are defined under Sub-section (105) of

Section 65 of the Act to mean any services provided or to

be provided to various persons, including those falling

under sub-clause (zzm), i.e. service provided to any person

by Airports Authority or by any other person, in any airport

or a civil enclave.

4

14. The aforesaid sub-clause (zzm) is wide enough to cover any

kind of service provided to any person by the Airport

Authorities in any airport or a civil enclave. Therefore,

whatever services are provided by the Airports Authority in

any airport falls under “taxable service” in view of

sub-clause (zzm).

15. The relevant portion of Section 66 reads as under:

“There shall be levied a tax (hereinafter referred to as the service tax) at the rate of twelve per cent. of the value of taxable services referred to in sub-clauses

(a)……….(zzm)………of clause (105) of section 65 and collected in such manner as may be prescribed.”

16. The aforesaid provision provides for levy of service tax on

“taxable services” as referred to in sub-clause (zzm) of Sub-

section (105) of Section 65 of the Act.

17. Section 65 is a section which provides for the definitions

of certain terms including “cargo handling service” and

“taxable service”. Cargo handling service is defined in Sub-

section (23) whereas taxable service has been defined

under Sub-section (105). The definition of taxable service

read with sub-clause (zzm) means any service provided or

to be provided to any person, by Airports Authority or by

5 any other person in any airport or a civil enclave. The

conjoint reading of sub-clause (zzm) with Sub-section

(105) makes it clear that taxable services are those services

which are provided to any person by the Airports Authority

in any airport or a civil enclave.

18. The aforesaid definition of the taxable service is very wide

and takes into its fold any kind of service that may be

provided to any person by the Airports Authority in any

airport. Accordingly, all kinds of services rendered by the

Airports Authority in any airport are taxable services and

are chargeable to service tax under Section 66 of the Act.

19. It may be pertinent to note that sub-clause (zzm) was

introduced w.e.f. 10.09.2004. Accordingly, any kind of

services whether in respect of export cargo provided by the

Airports Authority to any person after inclusion of sub-

clause (zzm) would be taxable service.

20. The definition of “cargo handling service” includes various

kinds of services rendered at the airport, but it specifically

excludes “handling of export cargo”. Thus, “handling of

export cargo” stands excluded from the “cargo handling

service” but that by itself would not be sufficient to exclude

6 it from the definition of taxable service under Sub-section

(105) of Section 65 of the Act. The services rendered by the

Airports Authority to any person in any airport are in the

nature of taxable service and the exclusion of “export

cargo” from the definition of “cargo handling service”

makes no difference as to the chargeability of service tax

on the services so rendered falls under the taxable service.

21. This is also the intent of the charging Section 66 of the Act,

which provides that there shall be tax levied on the

services referred to in sub-clauses as mentioned therein,

including sub-clause (zzm). In short, any kind of services

which are covered under any of the sub-clauses of Section

66, including (zzm) are chargeable to tax and are taxable

service.

22. The various circulars relied upon by Mr. Y. K. Kapur,

learned counsel for the appellant, are of no avail, as they

are merely circulars and cannot override the express

statutory provisions.

23. Accordingly, we are of the opinion that the CESTAT or the

Authorities below have not erred in taxing the services

rendered by the appellant in relation to export cargo as

7 taxable service under sub-clause (zzm) of Sub-section

(105) of Section 65 of the Act with effect from 10.09.2004.

24. The appeal, as such lacks merit and is, accordingly,

dismissed.

25. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

.............……………………………….. J.

(PANKAJ MITHAL)

.............……………………………….. J.

(PRASANNA B. VARALE) NEW DELHI;

SEPTEMBER 23, 2025.

8