Agauta Sugar And Chemicals vs State Of U.P. & Ors
- SCC(1997) 10 SCC 99
- Neutral1997 INSC 459
- AIRAIR 1997 SC 2387
- SCR[1997] 3 SCR 1169
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where a District Collector has attached the stock-in-hand of a sugar factory in exercise of recovery proceedings to satisfy arrears owed to sugarcane suppliers, the court may issue interim directions requiring the Collector to assess what quantum of sugar stock is necessary to satisfy the legitimate claims of cane growers and permit sale of the permitted stock, with proceeds credited to an account from which full payment to suppliers is made before any other claims against the factory are addressed. Where a sugar factory owes both dues to sugarcane suppliers and other liabilities such as excise duty and employee wages, a court may direct that after satisfaction of supplier claims from the first tranche of permitted sales, the factory may apply for release of further stock to meet these secondary obligations, with the Collector to assess and allow such release within a defined timeframe.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
These appeals by special leave, arise from the judgment and orders of the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court, made on February 27, 1997 and March 2, 1997 in C.M. Application No.1255(w)/97 in Writ Petition No.775(MB) /97 and Writ Petition No.775/MB/97.
It is not necessary to reiterate all the factual details. Sufficer it to state that the appellant had used the sugarcane supplied by the cane growers individually or through the societies. As a consequence, we are informed, around Rs.29 crores are in arrears for payment to the cane- growers. The Collector exercising the power of recovery proceedings has attached the sugar stock-in-hand; against that, the appellant filed a writ petition. Pending writ petition, the High Court has granted certain directions, which ultimately could not be complied with. Consequently, the interim directions stood vacated. Thus, these appeals by special leave.
Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, we think that the following order would meet the situation:
(1) The District Collector, Bulandshahar is directed to assess as to what is the quantum of the Sugar stock-in-hand would be sufficient to meet the payment of price of the sugarcane together with interest to all the cane growers towards the sugarcane supplied by them for all the crushing seasons as also the Societies' commission. It would be a first charge and recordable against the stock of sugar. On so assessing, he would permit the appellant to sell that quantum of stock of sugar. The sale proceeds thereof, when received from the appellant, are directed to be credited to an account to be opened by the Collector in a nationalised Bank towards this amount. the Collector is directed to depute a responsible officer of his collectorate to be present at the time of sale. The officer would ensure that the sale would be made only of the permitted stock and that the sale proceeds are credited to the said account directed to be opened in that behalf. On the amount directed to be opened in that behalf. On the amount being so deposited, the entire amount due shall Be paid to the cane growers. (2) After the sale thus is effected and payment made to the cane growers, it would be open to the appellant to file an application before the Collector stating as to what amount it is liable to pay towards Excise Duty and arrears of wages to the employees etc. On the statement so made, the District Collector is directed to assess as to what quantity of sugar from the remaining stock-in-hand would meet the above requirements; he would accordingly allow the release of that part the stock-in-hand for sale by the appellant for liquidation of Excise Duty, arrears of wages etc. The above exercise would be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this order. In the event of the appellant succeeding in the writ petition, appropriate directions may be given by the High Court in the main writ petition for mutual adjustment of any amount repayable by the cane growers. The order of attachment would stand lifted after compliance of these directions. If there is any difficulty in the implementation of this order, liberty is given to the appellant to approach this Court.
Pending implementation of this order, we hope and trust that no further coercive steps will be taken and no officers, who are members of the appellant-company or shareholders of the company, would be detained.
Appeals are accordingly disposed of. No costs.
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free