A.J. Joseph vs Union Of India & Ors
- SCC(1996) 7 SCC 392
- Neutral1996 INSC 33
- AIRAIR 1996 SC 1010
- SCR[1996] 1 SCR 213
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
A civil servant working in a remote area who receives the special allowance prescribed by the Fundamental Rules for that area has not been denied equal treatment or discriminated against merely because he seeks a higher scale of pay for his specific post, where no such higher scale has been prescribed by Government policy for that post; the remedy for grievances regarding pay scales is not to be sought through administrative tribunals on grounds of discrimination when the applicant is receiving all allowances and benefits to which he is entitled under the governing rules.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
This appeal is filed against the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Calcutta Bench dated March 11, 1987 made in ND OA No. 12/A&N/87. The appellant claimed higher scale of pay as head Compounder. Though the Health Department in Andman & Nicobar Island and recommended to consider his case of grant of special pay, the Government after elaborate consideration in proceedings dt. April 21, 1976 considered that question of prescribing any higher scale of pay for the post of Head compounder in Andman & Nicobar Island does not arise. The Tribunal has held that this being a policy decision, the Tribunal cannot give the direction to prescribe the higher scale of pay to the Head Compounder.
Ms. Lily Thomas, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant relying upon Fundamental rule 9(25) Clause 7(iii) contended that the appellant is entitled to the special pay on par with others which is being denied to the appellant. Shri A.N. Jayaram, the learned Additional Solicitor General Appearing for the respondents stated that this grievance was not made by the appellant at any point of time. As a fact all those who are working in Andman & Nicobar Island, as per the Fundamental rules, are being paid Andman special pay and the appellant is not discriminated on that account. Accepting the contention of the counsel for the respondents, we are of the considered view that the grievance of the appellant is not well founded. It is needless to mention that whatever direction that have been given by the Government of India under the Fundamental Rules for payment of special pay of the employees working in Andman & Nicobar Island, they are entitled for the same and accordingly such special pay be paid to all the eligible persons including the appellant.
The appeal is dismissed with the above observations.
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free